@ISIDEWITHQuestionstransportationStarted 9mos agoActive 2mos ago

Should the government require that all new vehicles be designed to preserve classic automobile aesthetics?

Proponents argue that it would preserve cultural heritage and appeal to those who value traditional designs. Opponents argue that it would stifle innovation and limit the design freedom of car manufacturers.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Florida

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 566 Florida voters.

16%
Yes
84%
No
16%
Yes
84%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 566 Florida voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 566 Florida voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Florida voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9MVCVJH from Virginia  answered…9mos9MO

No, what type of question is this? It would look super cool though.

 @9PR98FT from Texas  answered…7mos7MO

What in the hell does this even mean? What is “classic automobile aesthetics”? Why should I have to look up what this is. Obviously, this question has an issue with wording - smh

 @9PWBSX7 from Florida  answered…7mos7MO

This is stupid and doesn't belong as platform issue. We have bigger things to worry about and fix.

 @9PYG8XG from Arkansas  answered…7mos7MO

No, I wish companies would do this voluntarily, but it should not be required

 @9QDDWBB from Nevada  answered…7mos7MO

No, but the classic aesthetics should be encouraged as long as new technologies can be implemented to improve driving

 @9RKSSHQ from Utah  answered…6mos6MO

No. Why would we allow the government to regulate aesthetics? They should only regulate designs when it concerns safety.

 @9XZGVN4  from Indiana  answered…3mos3MO

The Government should require all new vehicles to be designed for safety and the lessening of impact when and if a pedestrian is hit.

 @9MYCFKY from Pennsylvania  answered…8mos8MO

I support classic automobile aesthetics, but the government should have absolutely nothing to do with this.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2mos2MO

Mexico Slams U.S. Policies as Trump Renews Border War

President Claudia Sheinbaum suggested Tuesday that Mexico could retaliate with tariffs of its own, after U.S. President-elect Donald Trump threatened to impose 25% import duties on Mexican goods if the country doesn’t stop the flow of drugs and migrants across the border.Sheinbaum said she was willing to engage in talks on the issues, but said drugs were a U.S. problem.“One tariff would be followed by another in response, and so on until we put at risk common businesses,” Sheinbaum said, referring to U.S. automakers that have plants on both sides of the border.She said Tuesday that Mexico had done a lot to stem the flow of migrants, noting “caravans of migrants no longer reach the border.” However, Mexico’s efforts to fight drugs like the deadly synthetic opioid fentanyl — which is manufactured by Mexican cartels using chemicals imported from China — have weakened in the last year.Sheinbaum said Mexico suffered from an influx of weapons smuggled in from the United States, and said the flow of drugs “is a problem of public health and consumption in your country’s society.”Sheinbaum also criticized U.S. spending on weapons, saying the money should instead be spent regionally to address the problem of migration. “If a percentage of what the United States spends on war were dedicated to peace and development, that would address the underlying causes of migration,” she said.Sheinbaum’s bristly response suggests that Trump faces a much different Mexican president than he did in his first term.Back in late 2018, former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador was a charismatic, old-school politician who developed a chummy relationship with Trump. The two were eventually able to strike a bargain in which Mexico helped keep migrants away from the border — and received other countries’ deported migrants — and Trump backed down on the threats.

▲  1613 replies

Active 36mins ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…41mins41m

CIA Warns Iran Could Go Nuclear In Months

New U.S. intelligence reveals Iranian scientists are exploring a faster, cruder approach to developing nuclear weapons, potentially reducing development time to months rather than yearsIran currently has enough nuclear fuel for four or more bombs but has not made the decision to develop weapons, according to U.S. officialsRecent Israeli counterstrikes have significantly weakened Iran's position, destroying missile defenses around Tehran and crippling missile fuel production capabilitiesIran's President Pezeshkian, who took office after his predecessor's death in a helicopter crash, is seeking negotiations while potentially being unaware of military nuclear developmentsThe country maintains two parallel regimes: a military/intelligence deep state reporting to Ayatollah Khamenei, and a diplomatic front with limited knowledge of nuclear activitiesIran could theoretically enrich uranium to weapons-grade (90%) within days, but traditionally would need 1-18 months to create a deliverable warheadNew intelligence suggests Iran is exploring creation of crude, older-style nuclear weapons that could be assembled much faster than sophisticated modern designsWhile such weapons couldn't be mounted on missiles, they could serve as a deterrent by demonstrating nuclear capabilitiesThe situation will be discussed between Trump and Netanyahu during the Israeli PM's White House visitIran's regional influence has diminished significantly, with Hamas and Hezbollah weakened and Syria no longer serving as an effective route for Iranian weapons

▲  1011 replies