Proponents argue that it would preserve cultural heritage and appeal to those who value traditional designs. Opponents argue that it would stifle innovation and limit the design freedom of car manufacturers.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
State Senate District
Zipcode
Response rates from 235 Colorado voters.
8% Yes |
92% No |
8% Yes |
92% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 235 Colorado voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 235 Colorado voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Colorado voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9MVCVJH9mos9MO
No, what type of question is this? It would look super cool though.
@9PR98FT7mos7MO
What in the hell does this even mean? What is “classic automobile aesthetics”? Why should I have to look up what this is. Obviously, this question has an issue with wording - smh
@9PWBSX77mos7MO
This is stupid and doesn't belong as platform issue. We have bigger things to worry about and fix.
@9PYG8XG7mos7MO
No, I wish companies would do this voluntarily, but it should not be required
@9QDDWBB7mos7MO
No, but the classic aesthetics should be encouraged as long as new technologies can be implemented to improve driving
@9RKSSHQ6mos6MO
No. Why would we allow the government to regulate aesthetics? They should only regulate designs when it concerns safety.
@9XZGVN4 3mos3MO
The Government should require all new vehicles to be designed for safety and the lessening of impact when and if a pedestrian is hit.
@9MYCFKY8mos8MO
I support classic automobile aesthetics, but the government should have absolutely nothing to do with this.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
