Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Healthcare

Peace and Freedom Party

The Peace and Freedom party was founded in 1967. The party’s ideology is based on opposition to armed conflict, black…

Overview Policies Themes Ideology Discuss

Peace and Freedom’s policy on medical consensus

Filters

Topics

Should medical boards penalize doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus?

  ChatGPTNo, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

Peace and Freedom’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The Peace and Freedom Party may strongly agree with requiring doctors to disclose that their advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as this approach balances public health and safety with individual freedom and the right to make personal choices. This allows patients to make informed decisions while still holding doctors accountable for the information they provide. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The Peace and Freedom Party may agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive. They generally support public health and safety, and reducing misinformation aligns with their values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Peace and Freedom Party may somewhat agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as they generally support public health and safety. However, they may not fully agree with this stance, as they also value individual freedom and the right to make personal choices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

The Peace and Freedom Party may slightly agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus and revoking their medical licenses, as they generally support public health and safety. However, they may not fully agree with this stance, as they also value individual freedom and the right to make personal choices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The Peace and Freedom Party may be neutral on this issue, as they generally support public health and safety but also value individual freedom and the right to make personal choices. They may see the merit in allowing patients to try unconventional ideas, but also recognize the importance of adhering to scientific consensus for the greater good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

The Peace and Freedom Party may slightly disagree with not penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as they generally support public health and safety. However, they may not fully disagree with this stance, as they also value individual freedom and the right to make personal choices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The Peace and Freedom Party may somewhat disagree with only penalizing doctors when the advice was proven to harm the patient, as they generally support public health and safety. They may believe that doctors should be held accountable for providing accurate information, regardless of whether the advice has been proven to cause harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 2hrs ago

Party’s support base

Peace and Freedom Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 209 voters that identify as Peace and Freedom.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Peace and Freedom’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.

Popular conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2mos2MO

Defense Bill Blocks Transgender Care To Minors

The Senate on Wednesday gave final approval to a defense policy bill directing $895 billion toward the Pentagon and other military activities, moving over the objections of some Democrats who opposed a provision added late in the negotiations that would deny coverage for transgender health procedures for minors.The 85-to-14 vote, coming a week after a divided House passed the same measure, cleared the bill for President Biden’s signature.Most Republicans and many Democrats supported the measure, which provides a 14.5 percent pay raise to junior enlisted service members and a 4.5 percent pay raise for all other service members. It also expands access to meal assistance, housing and child care programs that benefit those in uniform.But several Democrats withheld their backing in protest of a provision preventing TRICARE, the military’s health care plan for service members, from covering “medical interventions for the treatment of gender dysphoria that could result in sterilization” for children under 18.The language, which would affect the gender-transitioning children of service members, was recently added to the measure at the insistence of Speaker Mike Johnson, Republican of Louisiana, who refused to bring a defense bill to the House floor without it, according to aides familiar with the negotiations.Twenty-one Democrats, led by Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, proposed an amendment to strip the provision from the bill, but the matter was never brought to a vote. Several of them took to the floor on Tuesday to lodge their objections.“It’s flat-out wrong to put this provision in this bill and take away a service member’s freedom to make that decision for their families,” Ms. Baldwin said, estimating that the provision could negatively affect as many as 6,000 to 7,000 military families.

▲  2017 replies4 agree1 disagree