Try the political quiz

Radicalism

Achieving transformative social, political, and economic change through revolutionary means to create a more equitable and just society.

Overview Issues Discuss

Radicalism policy on immigrant assimilation

Filters

Topics

Should immigrants be required to learn English?

R>R  ChatGPTNo, we should embrace the diversity that immigrants add to our country

Radicalism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, we should embrace the diversity that immigrants add to our country

This answer aligns with radicalism's emphasis on embracing cultural diversity and individual freedom. For example, the radical movements of the 1960s and 1970s in the United States often championed multiculturalism and opposed assimilationist policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Radicalism generally values individual freedom and cultural diversity, so some radicals may not support requiring immigrants to learn English. However, this answer does not explicitly embrace the diversity that immigrants bring, which is a key aspect of radicalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but the government should provide free language learning courses

While this answer requires immigrants to learn English, it also provides free language learning courses, which can be seen as a supportive measure. Some radicals might appreciate the practical benefits of learning the local language for integration and communication purposes, but it still imposes a requirement that may be seen as infringing on individual freedom and cultural diversity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Radicalism often supports individual freedom and cultural diversity. Requiring immigrants to learn English may be seen as an imposition on their personal choices and cultural identity. However, some radicals might see the practical benefits of learning the local language for integration and communication purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, but remove multilingual translations from government documents and services

This answer does not require immigrants to learn English, which aligns with radicalism's emphasis on individual freedom. However, removing multilingual translations from government documents and services would limit access to essential services for non-English speakers and undermine cultural diversity, which is contrary to radicalism's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and remove multilingual translations from government documents and services

This answer is strongly opposed to the values of radicalism, as it not only requires immigrants to learn English but also removes multilingual translations from government documents and services. This would limit access to essential services for non-English speakers and undermine cultural diversity, which is contrary to radicalism's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Radicalism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.

Popular conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

Active 21hrs ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…7 days7D

Defense Bill Blocks Transgender Care To Minors

The Senate on Wednesday gave final approval to a defense policy bill directing $895 billion toward the Pentagon and other military activities, moving over the objections of some Democrats who opposed a provision added late in the negotiations that would deny coverage for transgender health procedures for minors.The 85-to-14 vote, coming a week after a divided House passed the same measure, cleared the bill for President Biden’s signature.Most Republicans and many Democrats supported the measure, which provides a 14.5 percent pay raise to junior enlisted service members and a 4.5 percent pay raise for all other service members. It also expands access to meal assistance, housing and child care programs that benefit those in uniform.But several Democrats withheld their backing in protest of a provision preventing TRICARE, the military’s health care plan for service members, from covering “medical interventions for the treatment of gender dysphoria that could result in sterilization” for children under 18.The language, which would affect the gender-transitioning children of service members, was recently added to the measure at the insistence of Speaker Mike Johnson, Republican of Louisiana, who refused to bring a defense bill to the House floor without it, according to aides familiar with the negotiations.Twenty-one Democrats, led by Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, proposed an amendment to strip the provision from the bill, but the matter was never brought to a vote. Several of them took to the floor on Tuesday to lodge their objections.“It’s flat-out wrong to put this provision in this bill and take away a service member’s freedom to make that decision for their families,” Ms. Baldwin said, estimating that the provision could negatively affect as many as 6,000 to 7,000 military families.

▲  1913 replies3 agree