+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 223 Rochelle Mercedes Garza voters.

99%
Yes
1%
No
78%
Yes
0%
No
10%
Yes, and use the U.N. peacekeeping forces to protect our interests
0%
No, and remove the U.N. headquarters from the U.S.
10%
Yes, but scale back our current involvement

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 223 Rochelle Mercedes Garza voters.

Chart
Line chart with 7 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 223 Rochelle Mercedes Garza voters.

Chart
Line chart with 8 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Rochelle Mercedes Garza voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @4QW6TX3from North Dakota  answered…4yrs4Y

Donald Trump is correct. We need to renegotiate our affiliation with both the UN and NATO. If they cannot begin to provide funding for their own operations, then they need to go. The US has become their funding for anything they choose to do and America is fed up paying for their nonsense. We either need to have more control over what they choose to do or they need to get other countries to pay for it!

 @4RDCW6Gfrom Montana  answered…4yrs4Y

The USA should obey INTERNATIONAL LAW. We can cooperate fully with the U.N. without losing our sovereignty. Lately the USA has been a rogue nation.

 @4QR5R98from Washington  answered…4yrs4Y

No, and remove the U.N. entirely from existence. It is absolutely the biggest threat to our sovereignty as an independent nation and our freedom from a one world slavery system a.k.a. the NWO.

 @4PR6WX8from Colorado  answered…4yrs4Y

Calling the UN a "world government" is fallacious. It's more akin to an international negotiating table with a name and a permanent staff to keep it running. What we need is an actual world government. See you in 100 years.

 @4W97ZPKfrom Maine  answered…4yrs4Y

We should push for an organization that only allows countries who respect human rights to have a say. Example: Why was Uganda under Idi Amin in the `70s and Lybia in 2003 allowed to have Najat al-Hajjaji in charge of the UN human rights commission? Like asking Hitler to oversee violations in a Concentration camp.

 @4PL25HBfrom California  answered…4yrs4Y

The feminists are taking over, if there were completely removed from the situation, then maybe I would support this.

 @4QDFKYNfrom Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes only to veto the two state solution that's just the same thing as Hitler's final solution

 @4NY2GFKfrom Utah  answered…4yrs4Y

What UN? The one that ignores the human rights violations of Saudi and the other Islamic terrorists factories? Why does it exist? Human Rights are not involved in the current agenda. If it exists it should function as it is funded. Currently it does not.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “United Nations” news articles, updated frequently.