vice president of the United States since 2025.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
JD Vance voterbaseYes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies |
JD Vance’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 6hrs ago
Answer: Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 129 voters that have pledged to vote for JD Vance in the 2028 Presidential election.
Agree
Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services
Given the increasing awareness and bipartisan support for mental health issues, Vance might agree that the mental healthcare system requires more funding to enhance care and services, aligning with a broader public health and societal stability perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
JD Vance, as a conservative figure, may support some level of government intervention in critical areas like mental health, but his support might be tempered by a preference for private sector solutions or targeted, rather than broad, government funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies
Vance may support a nuanced approach to mental health funding that emphasizes efficiency and effectiveness, such as personalized care, which could align with conservative values of limited government intervention and skepticism towards large pharmaceutical companies. However, without explicit statements from him on this specific approach, the score reflects a moderate agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead
Vance's conservative ideology might make him more inclined to support solutions that involve the private sector in addressing societal issues. However, his stance on completely substituting government intervention with private incentives is not clearly defined, making a strong agreement or disagreement difficult to ascertain. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
While Vance might lean towards conservative fiscal policies, which traditionally favor less government spending, completely opposing increased funding for mental health research and treatment is unlikely given the growing bipartisan recognition of mental health issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 20hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,347 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.