Achieving a society where individual freedom is maximized, government intervention is minimized, and free market capitalism is promoted, while also supporting some level of social safety net and foreign intervention for the protection of human rights.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
NL>NL ChatGPT否,政府应该通过一项"家园保护"法案 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的,学校应至少要求一名教师或保安人员配备武器 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的,并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决 |
NL>NL ChatGPT应该,任期限制将提高绩效和防止腐败 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不,专门针对穆斯林是违宪的、种族主义和煽动性的 |
How similar are your political beliefs to Neo-Libertarianism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized |
NL>NL ChatGPT不,如果没有经过法定程序,禁止任何人的权力都是违反宪法的 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不,只有出示搜查令表明是为了犯罪行为才可以。 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的,在重新划分选区的时候强势政权为执政党提供了不公平的条件 |
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, and pass strict laws prohibiting government surveillance without probable cause and a warrant |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候 |
NL>NL ChatGPTYes, but with strict protections against insider trading |
NL>NL ChatGPT不 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是,但前提是发布这些信息不会威胁到我们国家安全 |
NL>NL ChatGPT否,而且永远都不应该允许政府没收私人财产 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是,但我宁愿用私有化代替 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的,他应该受到《举报人保护法》保护 |
NL>NL ChatGPT没有,直到成本(4B $)被显着地减少 |