+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 42.5k State Senate District 2 voters.

34%
Yes
66%
No
23%
Yes
58%
No
6%
Yes, I support a majority of the plan but not all aspects
5%
No, open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs
3%
Yes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better
3%
No, government should not be involved in healthcare
2%
Yes, and allow consumers to choose providers and import pharmaceuticals from other countries

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 42.5k State Senate District 2 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 42.5k State Senate District 2 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from State Senate District 2 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @4RTCKHBfrom California  answered…4yrs4Y

Too much emphasis is placed on current medicine! "Modern " medicine is still not very good!

Many Americans get too caught up in medicine when IN FACT health is easily maintained, for example eat natural healthy foods, exercise, and have a good Attitude, etc.

 @8LBTY8Pfrom Maine  answered…4yrs4Y

I support the part where people with preexisting conditions cannot be denied healthcare, but generally healthcare shouldn’t be controlled by the government, since it increases wait times and becomes really inefficient and expensive. Also, i think that health care shoud be free

 @4SL5BYMfrom New York  answered…4yrs4Y

Adopt Canadian or European healthcare system. Pharmaceutical companies own the USA.

 @4RVPH5Qfrom Arizona  answered…4yrs4Y

I find it hypocritical for Congress to enact a law from which they have excluded themselves.

 @kmwhite59from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No, it is just a ploy by pharmaceutical companies and the government to get the American people hooked on pharmaceuticals from the womb to the tomb.

 @4Y89PDJfrom Guam  answered…4yrs4Y

No I don't. I do think the government (if there is one) has an obligation to promote HEALTH and how people can stay healthy. Programs funded by the government should be in line with this and corporations promoting products harmful to health ( which would raise the cost of healthcare across the board and burden the taxpayer((if there was a government healthcare system)) should be required to label such products as "harmful to health" and tax the corporations heavily. Certain ingredients should be banned and companies found promoting profit over health should be put out of business. Also, these companies should NOT be allowed to sponsor sporting events Pepsi, Frito Lay, Marlboro, Budweiser...). Marketing to children should be considered a crime.

 @4V9SWMMfrom Arizona  answered…4yrs4Y

No. The ACA is an obvious socialist wealth redistribution scheme. The public through their government should have a vested interest in general public health. However, personal responsibility for one's health should be Naturally Darwinistic and can never be effectively managed by government.

 @4RQM7QWfrom Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

We need to encourage more competition in our society as a whole and in the medical community especially.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Obamacare” news articles, updated frequently.