Lab-grown meat is produced by culturing animal cells and could serve as an alternative to traditional livestock farming. Proponents argue that it can reduce environmental impact and animal suffering, and improve food security. Opponents argue that it may face public resistance and unknown long-term health effects.
43% Yes |
57% No |
43% Yes |
57% No |
See how support for each position on “Lab Grown Meat” has changed over time for 6.3k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Lab Grown Meat” has changed over time for 6.3k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9MRFP832wks2W
Yes, but when the meat is sold it should be required to disclose that it is lab grown as well as undergo several chemical tests.
@9MQ8Z962wks2W
Yes, but only after extensive testing has been performed and verified in a triple blind study performed by an independent org that is verifiably not bought out by a party of interest.
@9NHM5N65 days5D
No, the current iteration of the technology does nothing to reduce climate impacts of industrial animal husbandry.
@9N8XZVD1wk1W
Yes, but without subsidies and without calling it meat. It must be labeled as "lab-grown" or "fake" meat. Also, this should be decided at the state level.
@9N8XVGK1wk1W
Yes, but only with strict oversight and regulation by the FDA to establish standards for lab-grown meat sold in the US.
@9N8JFLX1wk1W
Yes, and let the consumer decide. The producers of lab-grown meat must clearly state the nutritional information and ingredients.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
