+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 853 State Senate District 23 voters.

42%
Yes
58%
No
40%
Yes
56%
No
1%
Yes, but only if it’s tightly regulated and used with transparency
1%
No, it sets a dangerous precedent for government control over citizens
0%
Yes, but only targeting criminal hotspots to protect vulnerable communities
0%
No, this would be too expensive to implement
0%
No, I trust the technology but not the humans that could misuse it

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 853 State Senate District 23 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 853 State Senate District 23 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from State Senate District 23 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9L4Z23B  from Pennsylvania  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, as long as data is stored securely and not sold to third parties, and technology is used only in public spaces where expectation of privacy is not expected

 @9RVFYF3 from North Carolina  answered…7mos7MO

Never for mass surveillance, but targeted surveillance should be permitted if a warrant showing probable cause of criminal or terrorist activity is acquired

 @9SXRZYY from Pennsylvania  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but only to look for individuals whose image has been uploaded into a system to track those individuals specifically.

 @9VLZGRV from Oklahoma  answered…5mos5MO

No, absolutely not this is a clear violation of mass privacy. As there is a boundary between being recorded accidentally and without mean to harm, categorize, or surveil. And purposefully scanning hundreds of thousands of faces with the means of scanning a database to find a specific person then categorizing and memorizing those faces. In short it is a violation of public privacy that everyone should be afforded.

 @9RWQ4CJ from Tennessee  answered…7mos7MO

No, facial recognition technology has shown itself to be wildly undependable and struggles to correctly identify POC, which could lead to the arrest of innocents.

 @9TBZWTK from Wisconsin  answered…6mos6MO

There are both positives and negatives from this, but it can definitely be misused and people can use it for the wrong reasons.

 @9SLDRDJ from North Carolina  answered…7mos7MO

Never mass surveillance, but targeted surveillance against criminals and terrorists should be permitted with a warrant showing probable cause

 @9T6JGRN from Colorado  answered…6mos6MO

I think the government should use facial recognition technology for its own employees, not the public.