@ISIDEWITHQuestionstransportationStarted 9mos agoActive 7 days ago

Should the government restrict the use of advanced technology in vehicles to maintain human control and prevent over-reliance on technology?

This considers limiting the integration of advanced technologies in vehicles to ensure humans retain control and to prevent dependency on technological systems. Proponents argue that it preserves human control and prevents over-reliance on potentially fallible technology. Opponents argue that it hinders technological progress and the benefits that advanced technology can bring to safety and efficiency.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Green Party

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 357 Green Party voters.

54%
Yes
46%
No
54%
Yes
46%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 357 Green Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 357 Green Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Green Party voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9RDKXM8 from California  answered…7mos7MO

No, but the government should still require manual driving in case there is a technology malfunction.

 @9NCVR3Kfrom Virginia  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, or else the cause of accidents will be defended as “technological errors” instead of human negligence.

 @9TRVT2F  from California  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, restrictions are necessary and laws need to be updated to hold companies accountable for faulty autonomous vehicles causing accidents.

 @amayerica#1  from Iowa  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, until we have a clear understanding of what the technology inhibits for us to completely rely on it.

 @9TQ2NYH from New Jersey  answered…5mos5MO

I see both sides, I agree tech can make things safer but that we should also be careful and intentional with our use of it

 @9VJZYWB from Maryland  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but not now. In the future this may become a bigger issue but it’s not something to worry about at the moment.

 @9TR4434 from California  answered…5mos5MO

Yes and no, because while advanced tech could be very helpful in the cases of disabled drivers, this could lead to tech malfunctions and possible disaster. It might make driving significantly safer though, as some people are bad at driving.

 @B2S8D52 from Texas  answered…7 days7D

Yes, but only for the purpose of the coming generations, because I think everyone should be required to learn how to drive a car manually.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…6 days6D

Congress Calls Trump's Gaza Plan "Bizarre And Incoherent"

Trump proposed unprecedented U.S. control of Gaza Strip during a White House press conference with Netanyahu, suggesting "long-term ownership" that could last 10-15 years.The plan calls for nearly two million Palestinian residents to permanently relocate to neighboring countries, marking a dramatic shift from decades of U.S. policy.Congressional leaders from both parties expressed skepticism, with even Trump ally Lindsey Graham calling the proposal "problematic."Middle East experts, including former Palestinian Authority advisor Khaled Elgindy, criticized the plan as "bizarre and incoherent."White House officials argue mass relocation is the only viable option and seek to convince Egypt and Jordan to accept displaced Palestinians.The administration estimates Gaza reconstruction would take 10-15 years, far longer than the 3-5 years outlined in cease-fire agreements.The proposal lacks clear details on how to handle Palestinian resistance to relocation or potential U.S. military deployment.Saudi Arabia immediately rejected the plan, stating it wouldn't normalize ties with Israel without a clear path to Palestinian statehood.Trump expressed uncertainty about the current cease-fire's durability while presenting his proposal.The plan faces significant implementation challenges and could complicate other regional objectives, including Israel-Saudi normalization efforts.

▲  2421 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…6 days6D

Jon Stewart Begs Democrats To ‘Please Stop Trotting Out Chuck Schumer!'

Jon Stewart criticized Democrats for repeatedly using Chuck Schumer as their spokesperson against Trump, calling his performances ineffective and monotonous.Stewart mocked Schumer's response to Trump's trade war threats, particularly his simplistic explanation about Mexican imports like Corona beer and avocados.The former Daily Show host expressed frustration at Schumer's basic observation that "guacamole is made of avocados" as a response to complex trade policy issues.Stewart sarcastically highlighted the Democrats' poor strategic choice in selecting Schumer to counter Trump, whom he described as "one of the most savvy presidential media manipulators in history."The comedian ridiculed Schumer's appearance and presentation style, particularly mocking his use of reading glasses positioned low on his nose.Stewart's criticism centered on the Democratic leadership's judgment in repeatedly choosing an "uninteresting" and "monotone" spokesperson.The commentary addressed Trump's threats of tariffs against Canada and Mexico, though focused more on the Democratic response than the policy itself.Stewart used hyperbole to emphasize his point, stating that Schumer's speaking makes him "want to bomb Canada."The piece highlighted the perceived disconnect between Democratic messaging strategy and effective opposition to Trump's policies.Stewart's criticism suggested a broader frustration with Democratic leadership's media strategy and public presentation.

▲  4817 replies