This considers limiting the integration of advanced technologies in vehicles to ensure humans retain control and to prevent dependency on technological systems. Proponents argue that it preserves human control and prevents over-reliance on potentially fallible technology. Opponents argue that it hinders technological progress and the benefits that advanced technology can bring to safety and efficiency.
47% Yes |
53% No |
47% Yes |
53% No |
See how support for each position on “Advanced Automotive Technology” has changed over time for 865 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Advanced Automotive Technology” has changed over time for 865 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9NCVR3K1wk1W
Yes, or else the cause of accidents will be defended as “technological errors” instead of human negligence.
@93X4TMH 3wks3W
No, but strictly regulate it to ensure maximum safety
@8RBQDDP 3wks3W
Yes, in cases where it makes sense, while simultaneously pursuing the development of technology that can increase safety for humans
@9MLJ772 3wks3W
No, but technology implemented should be well-tested.
@9MLGYQ93wks3W
Regulate not restrict-add safeguards, not stifle innovation
@9MLGS343wks3W
Depends the specific thing advanced technology is assisting with, and the advancement of technology in vehicles in the near future
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.