Incentives for carpooling and shared transportation encourage people to share rides, reducing the number of vehicles on the road and lowering emissions. Proponents argue that it reduces traffic congestion, lowers emissions, and promotes community interactions. Opponents argue that it may not significantly impact traffic, could be costly, and some people prefer the convenience of personal vehicles.
60% Yes |
40% No |
60% Yes |
40% No |
See how support for each position on “Carpooling and Shared Transportation” has changed over time for 363 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Carpooling and Shared Transportation” has changed over time for 363 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9NG845V6 days6D
Yes, but the person in charge shall check for potential dangerous passenger
@9NFZPBF6 days6D
Yes but not by blocking off lanes for carpools; give carpoolers tax breaks
@9NFDDLZ6 days6D
It should be tested on a minor scale to see if it actually works before it is deployed on a national scale.
@9NC45VK1wk1W
No, carpooling is impartial. Public transportation is the way to go.
@9N6RHRB1wk1W
Both statmenets make a refutable claim to the other, but I stand undivided by either item, even though it reduces emmisions, it hurts the amount of gas used and time at work to provide a stable income with the current economy.
@9N5WBYD2wks2W
No, the costs of managing such a program would feasibly outweigh any potential benefits
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
