Full accessibility ensures that public transportation accommodates people with disabilities by providing necessary facilities and services. Proponents argue that it ensures equal access, promotes independence for people with disabilities, and complies with disability rights. Opponents argue that it can be costly to implement and maintain and may require significant modifications to existing systems.
83% Yes |
17% No |
83% Yes |
17% No |
See how support for each position on “Transportation Accessibility for People with Disabilities” has changed over time for 279 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Transportation Accessibility for People with Disabilities” has changed over time for 279 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@Chuggapyro 5 days5D
"Public" Transportation should be privatized and the Government shouldn't regulate it.
@9NFZPBF6 days6D
Yes, but only if there is no other disabilities-equipped public transport option for that route
@9NCV9NN 1wk1W
Yes, with a discount for public transport due to the fact that working may be harder with specific disabilities
@9N7G5X41wk1W
This should already be though out during the planning process for the transportation.
@ChaseOliverLibertarian 2wks2W
As long as public transportation is funded by taxpayers, which includes public-private partnerships, they must be fully accessible to all.
@ChaseOliverLibertarian 2wks2W
To the degree that public transportation is funded by taxpayers, which includes public-private transit partnerships, they must be fully accessible to everyone.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
