Fuel efficiency standards set the required average fuel economy for vehicles, aiming to reduce fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Proponents argue that it helps reduce emissions, save consumers money on fuel, and decrease reliance on fossil fuels. Opponents argue that it raises production costs, leading to higher vehicle prices, and may not have a significant impact on overall emissions.
49% Yes |
51% No |
49% Yes |
51% No |
See how support for each position on “Fuel Efficiency Requirements” has changed over time for 320 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Fuel Efficiency Requirements” has changed over time for 320 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9NHHTSR5 days5D
No, but it should provide incentives for more fuel efficient vehicles.
@9NF9B4M6 days6D
No, and current standards should be abolished and replaced with a general gas tax
@9N295MR 1wk1W
No, but we must continue to find ways to reduce fuel consumption & greenhouse gas emissions while simultaneously keeping gas prices low and we can do that by passing an executive order mandated that all gas companies cannot charge over $3 per gallon.
@Jcawolfson 1wk1W
Yes, to improve air quality and reduce health risks
@9N9NF6L1wk1W
Yes, it should be a national standard only not a state standard
@9N9CHQZ1wk1W
No, and reduce regulations on small to mid sized car and trucks.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
