@ISIDEWITHQuestionsCriminal IssuesStarted 4yrs agoActive 14hrs ago

Do you support qualified immunity for police officers?

Qualified immunity is a defense that police officers cannot be sued for misconduct if they were unaware at the time that their conduct was illegal and if there is no previous legal case with similar facts that ruled that officers may not engage in that conduct. Proponents argue that more intense criticism of police will disincentivize officers from doing their jobs resulting in crime rates going up. Opponents argue that police officers should be held more accountable for misconduct.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Right

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 47.5k Right voters.

61%
Yes
39%
No
42%
Yes
36%
No
11%
Yes, and provide more training and education for police officers
4%
No, and increase the personal liability for misconduct
7%
Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 47.5k Right voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 47.5k Right voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Right voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8PRWMDM from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

No, and provide more training and education for police officers

 @8PRH69S from Oregon  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but provide more training and education for police officers to prevent similar situations.

 @8PXYHF2 from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

No, and abolish the police

 @8PGGCFM from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

Don’t know.

 @8QCW4R8 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but provide more training and education for police officers

 @9DRFWHY from California  answered…1yr1Y

No, nobody is above the law

 @8QDHLKC from Maryland  answered…4yrs4Y

No, provide more training and education for police officers.

 @9DCTXHH from Oklahoma  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but provide more training and education for police officers, so misconduct rarely happens.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3mos3MO

AOC Sparks Backlash After Ditching Gender Pronouns

Famously progressive Democrat congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez raised eyebrows by removing her pronouns from her X account. The move from Squad lawmaker, 35, seen as one of the most liberal members of Congress, was seen by some as a sign that the cultural tide is turning following Donald Trump's election win. Journalist Benjamin Ryan said records showed AOC removed her 'she/her' pronouns sometime between August 3, 2023, and May 28, 2024. Critics branded her a hypocrite, and noted that just two years ago AOC apologized to followers for not having pronouns in her Instagram bio, claiming they 'fell off' and she didn't realize. Conservatives were quick to mock AOC after it was realized that she had removed the pronouns from her account bio. Some also noted that she changed her moniker from the genderless 'Representative' to 'Congresswoman' as she removed her pronouns. Ocasio-Cortez has long been a supporter of transgender rights, including so-called gender-affirming care for children, and transgender girls competing in female sports.But the Democrats more extreme stances were blamed as a massive vote loser for Kamala Harris in the recent election.An advert showing her supporting taxpayer-funded gender reassignment surgeries for illegal migrant prisoners was played on repeat by Team Trump.Many Dems' insistence that opposing hormones for trans children or banning trans girls from joining female sports teams was transphobic further alienated centrists.Immigration and inflation were the issues that ultimately swung the election for Donald Trump, but the Dems' unpopular trans stance has now forced a reckoning within the party.

▲  2117 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…12hrs12H

Trump Targets FAA Diversity Programs In Crash Aftermath

Trump made controversial claims linking diversity initiatives at the FAA to a deadly Potomac River collision that killed 67 people, despite acknowledging he had no evidence to support these assertions.The disability recruitment program Trump criticized actually began during his own administration in April 2019, with the FAA launching a pilot program for 20 people with targeted disabilities to work in air traffic operations.Experts, including Tennessee Garvey from the Organization of Black Aerospace Professionals, stated that no aviation incident has ever been attributed to diversity initiatives as a cause or contributing factor.The federal policy for hiring people with disabilities dates back to the Bush administration in 2003 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which was initially created to protect veterans with disabilities.FAA workforce diversity has shown minimal changes over recent years: white male representation decreased from 58.9% in 2016 to 55.3% in 2023, while employees with targeted disabilities increased from 0.7% to 2%.The aviation industry's diversity efforts were primarily driven by labor shortages and the need to fill positions as pilots retire, rather than purely demographic goals.All candidates, regardless of background or disability status, must meet the same rigorous standards for aptitude, medical qualifications, and security clearances.Historical barriers, including segregation, prevented Black aviation professionals from entering the industry until the civil rights movement and subsequent lawsuits.The Biden administration has continued similar diversity initiatives, with slight increases in representation across different demographic groups.A pending lawsuit filed by a conservative legal organization claims discrimination against applicants due to Obama-era hiring practices, though the case hasn't been resolved.

▲  179 replies