+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 2.2k 84118 voters.

62%
Yes
38%
No
50%
Yes
29%
No
9%
Yes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions
4%
No, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending
4%
Yes, and provide more free public transportation
3%
No, we have more important issues that need funding
2%
No, and we should privatize more public transportation services
0%
No, and we should reduce current spending

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.2k 84118 voters.

Chart
Line chart with 10 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 2.2k 84118 voters.

Chart
Line chart with 11 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from 84118 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @97ZLYW3 from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

Public transportation is not a federal issue. States or municipalities should address this

 @9S2PDWW from Virginia  answered…8mos8MO

The United States needs to spend more money on public transportation, in order to improve the national railway system and expand it, so it can reach other locations, improve The metro and subway systems in various cities and help cities build These systems, and they should help finance better bus, transportation within cities, and towns

 @9PZ2HB5 from New Jersey  answered…9mos9MO

Yes because I think the government should be more concerned with serving the citizens of it's own country rather than ignoring them and only focusing on citizens of other countries. The U.S. government is in a position where it should find a balance between serving it's people while simultaneously keeping friendly relations with other countries. I think the U.S. government has done a poor job at doing this.

 @sterlingiii  from Nevada  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, we must keep renovating public transportation countrywide until we have transportation to and from each state in this country my solution would be a free transit system organized by Elon Musk & other billionaires creating electric train stations that go to and from each city/state.

 @9L4Z23B  from Pennsylvania  answered…11mos11MO

Yes, but the 80% of the funding for projects should come from state, local, and private sources and be fully committed before asking the FTA for grants and loans

Top Debates

Explore and engage in the most popular conversations.

News, Transportation and 2024 Presidential

Biden administration pledges $6 billion for high-speed electric rail

@Diplom4cyBass1Y

Fifteen years for a non-existent, unnecessary high-speed rail from…wait for it… Bakersfield to Merced.

@PlatypusJim1Y

Isn't it estimated to cost $128 billion? If so that's $581,818.181 per mile. That means $3 billion will build 5.1 miles of track. How much are those train tickets going to cost?

@Diplom4cyBass1Y

Critical lifeline!? You must be joking? It's not even 3% of the $128 Billion in costs that the California High Speed Rail Authority projects.

It would be much cheaper, faster & more efficient to just pay for airline tickets. No tearing up critical infrastructure either.

 
45%
 

Classlessness and Democracy

The conversation revolves around the feasibility of a classless society, the nature of human behavior, and the structure of democracy, with contrasting views on hierarchy and representation.

Should the government increase spending on public transportation?

Yes, but also allow more privatization of public transport

 @VulcanMan62Y

The Soviet Union may have (supposedly) been attempting a classless society, but unfortunately they never actually managed to maintain nor even create one (I'm not a tankie, so I might be biased), which is why I cannot point to it as an example of an actual classless system. Sadly, they never ended up breaking past their State-Capitalist transitionary state into actual classlessness, or statelessness. Luckily, you're right, I believe we have a lot to learn from the plethora of mistakes of the Soviet Union.

Secondly, I did want to clarify that I put statelessness as a more likely secon…  Read more

@ThriftyQuokka2Y

democracy is not inherently oligarchic. It's designed to delegate decision-making to elected representatives, who are held accountable by the electorate. This delegation is a practical necessity due to the complexities of modern governance.

Take the example of India, the world's largest democracy. It would be impractical for the country's 1.3 billion citizens to directly vote on every single issue. Thus, they elect representatives who are supposed to reflect their interests and make decisions on their behalf.

This system doesn't preclude public participation. There are mec…  Read more

 @VulcanMan62Y

I don't think democracy is oligarchic, just "representative democracy" is oligarchic. Representative democracy is simply oligarchy disguised as a democracy, under the guise of freely choosing your own oligarchs.

I would argue that most of the current complexities of governance are largely the result of our current political and economic bureaucracies, not necessarily any kind of inherent problem of societies itself. Also, not every citizen needs to have a say on every little decision in the world, only in the decisions that apply to you or whatever "group" you are in,…  Read more

 
-4
75%
 

@ThriftyQuokka
is winning the debate

Political Ideologies Clash

The conversation involves a heated debate between two users on topics including the role of government, military, the US Constitution, and personal ideologies regarding a stateless society.

Should the government increase spending on public transportation?

Yes, but also allow more privatization of public transport

 @VulcanMan62Y

Why would that be better? That would just make transportation a for-profit industry, instead of a public service. It wouldn't even be "public transportation" if it was privately-owned-and-operated.

 @TruthHurts1012Y

lol you're wrong lol lol lol

 @VulcanMan62Y

Uh oh, are you getting mad now because you can't defend your presumptions?

 
-1
86%
-2
+1