+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 16.6k State Senate District 10 voters.

55%
Yes
45%
No
33%
Yes
36%
No
15%
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country
5%
No, they should be captured and given a fair trial
8%
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country
4%
No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 16.6k State Senate District 10 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 16.6k State Senate District 10 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from State Senate District 10 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8LXGL9P from Maine  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if either undeniable evidence of a planned or past attack is attained.

 @9GLVJ4S from Maryland  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only with Congressional approval and only if there is undeniable evidence of a past or impending attack.

 @9FCNKDJ from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

USA should stay with in USA when it comes down too criminal actions. Terrorists from other nations should be treated as if a War criminal.

 @sterlingiii  from Nevada  answered…8mos8MO

No, capture, interrogate, and imprison. If evidence is found they have already committed an attack against our country then they must be executed.

 @B2K5C3R from Arizona  answered…1wk1W

It all depends on the circumstances. If they can be captured alive, that’s preferred. Unfortunately sometimes lethal force is necessary for self-defense, so the US should be able to act in such a manner when needed.

 @B2GF3NX from Texas  answered…2wks2W

Yes, as long as there is sufficient and undeniable evidence that the target in question is indeed a terrorist