Social Equality

Very strongly agree

Yes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better

A mandatory single-payer system is often viewed by social equality advocates as the most equitable solution for healthcare, as it would theoretically ensure access to healthcare for everyone, regardless of income or social status. This aligns closely with the principles of social equality, which prioritize reducing disparities and ensuring equal access to essential services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and allow consumers to choose providers and import pharmaceuticals from other countries

Allowing consumers to choose providers and import pharmaceuticals from other countries could increase access to treatments and reduce costs, which aligns with the social equality goal of making healthcare more accessible and affordable. However, without measures to ensure that these options are equally available to all, regardless of income, this approach might not fully meet social equality ideals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Supporters of social equality generally favor policies that aim to reduce disparities in healthcare access and outcomes. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) was designed to increase health insurance coverage and affordability, which aligns with the goals of social equality. However, some may argue that it does not go far enough in addressing all aspects of healthcare inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, I support a majority of the plan but not all aspects

Supporting most aspects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act aligns with social equality goals of improving healthcare access and affordability. However, the qualification of not supporting all aspects might imply reservations about the extent to which the Act achieves these goals, leading to a slightly lower score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs

While the idea of increasing competition to reduce costs might seem beneficial, the social equality perspective might critique this approach for not adequately addressing the root causes of healthcare inequality, such as the inability of low-income individuals to afford insurance even at reduced rates. This approach does not directly address the issue of access to healthcare for all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Social equality ideology typically opposes viewpoints that reject reforms aimed at making healthcare more accessible and affordable. Opposing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act would be seen as opposing efforts to reduce healthcare disparities, which is contrary to the principles of social equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, government should not be involved in healthcare

The belief that government should not be involved in healthcare is fundamentally at odds with the social equality ideology, which often supports a strong role for government in redistributing resources and ensuring equal access to basic services, including healthcare. This position is likely seen as perpetuating inequality in healthcare access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.