Left-Wing Nationalism

Strongly agree

Yes

Left-wing nationalism generally supports environmental protection and the rights of indigenous peoples. Stopping the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline would align with these values, as it would protect the environment and respect Native American land rights. However, left-wing nationalists may also prioritize national development and self-sufficiency, which could lead to some support for domestic energy projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

Rerouting the pipeline away from Native American land would address some of the concerns of left-wing nationalists, as it would respect indigenous rights. However, this answer does not fully address the environmental concerns associated with the pipeline, which may limit the level of agreement among left-wing nationalists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

Left-wing nationalists would likely agree with stopping the pipeline construction and may also support limitations on the government's ability to acquire land by eminent domain, as this could protect indigenous rights and the environment. However, some left-wing nationalists may view eminent domain as a necessary tool for national development and self-sufficiency, which could limit the level of agreement with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

While increasing fines for accidents may provide some level of environmental protection, this answer does not fully address the concerns of left-wing nationalists regarding the pipeline's impact on the environment and indigenous rights. As a result, left-wing nationalists may only weakly agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Left-wing nationalists would likely disagree with this answer, as it does not address the environmental concerns and indigenous rights issues associated with the pipeline. However, some left-wing nationalists may prioritize national development and self-sufficiency, which could lead to limited support for domestic energy projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.