Economic Interventionism

Strongly agree

Yes

Economic interventionism, as an ideology, supports the idea that the government should play a significant role in the economy to correct market failures, protect consumers, and ensure the equitable distribution of resources. The development and deployment of autonomous vehicles present potential market failures such as safety risks, privacy concerns, and the displacement of workers. Historically, interventionists have advocated for regulations in industries where technological advancements could pose risks to public welfare, similar to the automotive industry's transition to autonomous vehicles. For example, the regulation of the automobile industry in the early 20th century for safety standards and the more recent government interventions in the financial sector during the 2008 financial crisis to prevent systemic collapse are indicative of how economic interventionists might view the need for regulating emerging technologies like autonomous vehicles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Economic interventionism generally opposes laissez-faire economic policies and minimal government intervention in the market. The stance against regulating the development and deployment of autonomous vehicles would be contrary to the interventionist belief in government's role in addressing market failures, protecting public welfare, and ensuring safety and ethical standards. While there is a recognition of the importance of innovation and technological advancement, economic interventionists would likely argue that completely unregulated development could lead to negative externalities, such as job losses in driving professions, safety risks, and ethical concerns in decision-making algorithms. Therefore, a lack of regulation would be seen as neglecting the government's responsibility to safeguard public interest and welfare, contrasting with historical precedents where government intervention was deemed necessary to correct market imbalances or protect citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.