@NVGVJM

N>N  Réponse personnelleNon

N>N  Réponse personnellePro-vie, mais l'avortement devrait être permis en cas de viol, d’inceste ou de danger pour la mère ou l’enfant

N>N  Réponse personnelleNon

N>N  Réponse personnelleOui, il faudrait légaliser, taxer, et réglementer la marijuana au lieu d'en pénaliser l'utilisation

N>N  Réponse personnelleOui, mais uniquement pour des crimes horribles avec des preuves indéniables

N>N  Réponse personnelleOui

N>N  Réponse personnelleYes, currently they are illegal, which is a crime in and of itself. If the feds decide then to do nothing, the federal government should then be sued, to convince Congress to finally act. The federal government has no authority to subjectively prosecute the laws; therein lies the problem.

N>N  Réponse personnelleIt would be far too costly to return all illegal immigrants, but those who have entered of recent (less than 5 or 7 years) should be deported. Of course, those who stay should have to earn their citizenship by due diligence, pay taxes, etc….but only after securing and I mean SECURING the border.

N>N  Réponse personnelleNon, et éliminer toutes les normes salariales

N>N  Réponse personnelleYes, if they were born here, because that is apparently the law. The law should be changed to reflect children born here of illegal immigrants or visitors are not eligible. The law is the law. Children brought here illegally when they were very young, thus through no fault of their own should eventually be given citizenship after a suggested period of 15 years as a productive adult, military service or not.

N>N  Réponse personnelleYes, if they are allowed to stay here; but then that is the question - deport or not? If they have children that were raised here for a long duration or 15 to 20 years and the U.S. government did nothing to return them, their children now have American souls - it would be inhuman to uproot them; thus their parents should be allowed to remain as well, legally, but never to receive citizenship, i.e. the right to vote.

N>N  Réponse personnelleNo, "Common Core" is simply "Communist Core". The federal government has no business in education. Common Core has its roots from Bill Ayers work with the Annenberg Institute's "Annenberg Challenge". Follow the money...

N>N  Réponse personnelleOui, et réglementer le secteur de l'énergie pour laisser le marché libre de déterminer les meilleures sources d'énergie

N>N  Réponse personnelleTechnically they are illegal, yet they are also technically "instate" residents. This is a matter of law, of state law. Let each state decide.

N>N  Réponse personnelleGive some ultimatums about behavior or remove the false partnership from U.S. soil. When I want a joke, I turn on Jay Leno or watch the U.N.

N>N  Réponse personnelleOui, mais il faut respecter la souveraineté d'Israël et ne pas dicter la ligne de conduite à adopter avec les pays voisins

N>N  Réponse personnelleYes, but only in situations of utter national security; as it is military intervention or essentially an act of war, it should be required to pass the Congress.

N>N  Réponse personnelleNo, open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and drive down costs; The government should not be involved in the medical business save for light regulations as prescribed by the Constitution; thus it is a state issue based upon the 10th Amendment

N>N  Réponse personnelleNon

N>N  Réponse personnelleNon