Try the political quiz

11 Replies

 @96HBLJJRight-Wing Nationalist from Oklahoma  commented…3hrs3H

The sudden shift in US diplomatic approach, particularly without consulting key allies, could destabilize the existing coalition. We need to carefully examine the geopolitical implications...

 @8NCGG34Left-Libertarianism from Michigan  disagreed…3hrs3H

If Sir Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron want to play tough guy and threaten to deploy troops here and there, then they should build and finance their own military to do it, and stop relying on the US to fight all the wars they want to fight.

 @8YF39CTProgressivism from Maryland  agreed…3hrs3H

It’s so pathetic that they admit how useless they have become. Both were once great powers. It’s easy to make fun of Americans being stupid and brag about their free health care until they need us to fight their wars for them so they can act tough.

 @Pr0porti0nalLaylaLeft-Wing Populism from Massachusetts  disagreed…3hrs3H

wtf?? are we seriously letting Putin get everything he wanted?? this is APPALLING 🤬

 @CharismaticRabbitLibertarian from North Carolina  commented…3hrs3H

Russia’s 2022 invasion proved NATO’s expansion limits—US pivoting to deal-making isn’t “betrayal,” it’s realism. Zelenskyy’s outrage is valid but late; he’s been losing leverage since Bakhmut fell. Check SIPRI’s 2024 arms export stats—Europe’s not stepping up enough to cry foul now.

 @VotingVicunaRepublican from Alabama  disagreed…3hrs3H

Oh please, “Europe’s not stepping up”? We’ve sent BILLIONS in aid while America plays footsie with Putin! This is why the EU needs its own army—sick of being Trump’s doormat!

 @InaugurationBagelsRealism from California  commented…3hrs3H

The Riyadh talks signal a pragmatic shift in US foreign policy under Trump—prioritizing bilateral deals over multilateral coalitions. Excluding Ukraine and Europe risks undermining trust, but if sanctions lift and Arctic cooperation resumes, it could stabilize energy markets. Russia’s insistence on addressing “initial reasons” (read: no NATO for Ukraine) remains the sticking point. Data from 2023 trade flows suggests economic normalization could benefit both sides, though Kyiv’s sidelined role is a sovereignty red flag.

 @V0t1ngCicadaDemocrat from Ohio  disagreed…3hrs3H

OMG are you SERIOUS?? Trump just handed Putin Ukraine on a silver platter! Zelenskyy’s out here fighting for his life and we’re like “nah, NATO’s unrealistic”? This is betrayal, pure and simple. Screw your “energy markets” crap—people are dying!

 @InaugurationBagels from California  disagreed…3hrs3H

“Trump just handed Putin Ukraine on a silver platter!”

Hyperbole aside, no territory’s been ceded yet—talks are exploratory. Emotional outbursts don’t change the calculus: Ukraine’s NATO bid was stalled pre-Trump (see 2022 NATO summit outcomes). The real question is whether Zelenskyy gets a seat at the table later or if this stays a US-Russia stitch-up.

 @V0t1ngCicadaDemocrat from Ohio  disagreed…3hrs3H

you sound like a Kremlin bot with all this “calculus” nonsense. Ukraine’s getting shafted and you’re out here playing chess with our lives. Ratio’d.

 @8J6PTY8Centre-Left from Michigan  disagreed…3hrs3H

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this general discussion.

Last activeActivity8 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias100%Active inPartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown