Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

2.9k Replies

 @B4HTT92 from Illinois  answered…4wks4W

It’s not neede but at your own advantage it fine it use but on the flip side technology can not always be trusted and they working of it

 @B2XGB6S from Illinois  answered…3mos3MO

yes, but I feel like it should be available for all agency to use and have complete transparency to the United States Citizens, unless it threatens national security.

 @B2F4335 from Illinois  answered…4mos4MO

Ai is getting too good and ive already had AIs steal one of my accounts so i don't want any more ways for ai to get in.

 @B2DPB8R from Illinois  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but only if it is tightly regulated, used with transparency, and is targeting criminal hotspots

 @9ZN4FDDRepublican from Illinois  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, but only for targeting criminal hotspots and protecting vulnerable communities with complete transparency but keeping in mind the government overreach when implementing

 @9XCVSZ7 from Illinois  answered…6mos6MO

No, because it would cost lots of tax payer money and it would have to be kept up regularly due to plastic surgery, aging, and other face altering occurrences (ie traumatic surgery).

 @9XCC7ZPNo Labels from Illinois  answered…6mos6MO

Since facial recognition is new and not everyone has access to updated tech like cell phones, computers and other tech devices it should not be required but an option to how they want to be identified.

 @9XBR9PW from Illinois  answered…6mos6MO

No, this is a violation of privacy and should only be used if there is a dangerous criminal in an area

 @9X62V8X from Illinois  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, but only in public and government owned areas to identify fleeing suspects but only law enforcement and the government should have access to this technology.

 @9WVD7FN from Illinois  answered…6mos6MO

No, this is an invasion of privacy for an average citizen and with the current environment surrounding AI and the capabilities of both it and people to modify or even eliminate video feeds/evidence, it could very easily lead to wrongful arrests or worse.

 @9WBDLWPNo Labels from Illinois  answered…7mos7MO

In between , only because it can be invading of one’s privacy and their rights as a human. On the other hand it can come in handy for a lot of different reasons

 @9W8RFRDSocialist from Illinois  answered…7mos7MO

I think that this would be a good option if the facial recognition technology was accurate. A faulty system could result in people being wrongfully accused of something.

 @9VR6LZW from Illinois  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, with outside restrictions on how this information is being used and forbidding the usage of it for financial purposes

 @9VHS4CZ from Illinois  answered…7mos7MO

facial recognition could be useful but cause more problems because people with similar features to criminals could get in legal trouble because of an error with it and also because it could see a real criminal and not detect them.

 @9VFGVZJ from Illinois  answered…7mos7MO

this is an invasion of privacy, but it is also necessary, because people with malicious intentions will take any workaround they can get.

 @9V3CMW7 from Illinois  answered…7mos7MO

I don't think this question should be removed but in my personal opinion I feel it is an unnecessary question compared to the more serious issues.

 @9TZS6Q9 from Illinois  answered…7mos7MO

This goes with the No stance, but I wanted to add more context and say that if people get power hungry, they might use that system to control the lives of the people

 @9TC7GSLGreen from Illinois  answered…8mos8MO

Due to modern technology facial recognition can be fault, due to ai and photographic altering. You can't trust face recognition. And should only be used as reference not fact

 @9T9GP72Independent from Illinois  answered…8mos8MO

No because everything is becoming technology soon humans wont even be needed for basic day to day jobs

 @9T7C24HDemocrat from Illinois  answered…8mos8MO

I think the government should do this but I also worry about people feeling like they're being tracked by the government

 @9T2N7NVProgressive from Illinois  answered…8mos8MO

Im in between both answers because yes it would make the public safer but at the same time anyone can be recognized and their privacy would be violated

 @9SZGT2T from Illinois  answered…8mos8MO

This is tough. I am for more public safety, but this concerns my rights to privacy. I can see this being abused.

 @9SZ7HWX from Illinois  answered…8mos8MO

Yes as long as its not the only source of evidence for conviction and is heavily audited and regulated

 @9SQVPDH from Illinois  answered…8mos8MO

No, and the government should be prohibited from collecting and storing biometric data of U.S. citizens

 @9YM6R9C from Illinois  answered…6mos6MO

It could be a good idea in hindsight its an invasion of privacy and could lead to an abrupt outroar.

 @9X2QBT5 from Illinois  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, but we will make sure that the people who work this will be unbiased and will not be used for bad

 @9W82HJC from Illinois  answered…7mos7MO

I believe we already are, but there should be more transparency and oversight. It is justified in certain cases

 @9VL3S8R  from Illinois  answered…7mos7MO

This would bring in hacking to more of an advanced level. As well as the fact that the system could malfunction at any moment.

 @9SN5ZBR from Illinois  answered…8mos8MO

Not really, as it will not allow privacy and can be taken advantage of by killers, or stalkers who can use it against their victims.

 @9S9GPSZ from Illinois  answered…9mos9MO

No, not until it is merely impossible for it to make a mistake and there are strong laws on them to prevent it from crossing people's civil liberty.

 @9MKWNW4 from Illinois  answered…12mos12MO

 @9ZFXK33Green from Illinois  answered…6mos6MO

in the terms it maintains peoples privacy with the surveillance only happening outside of houses and in the road.

 @9STDBC2 from Illinois  answered…8mos8MO

I think this is tricky because to a certain extent it would be okay but when used unfairly could be really uncomfortable

 @9NJFY9R from Illinois  answered…11mos11MO

Government should Only use facial recognition software on people they are actually looking for like criminals

 @9T8N7V9 from Illinois  answered…8mos8MO

yes but only to a limited degree, no tapping into personal items, mainly cause they can just raid our houses and residences anyways

 @9SXBCYN from Illinois  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, but should be only used when a criminal event occurred and shouldn't be easily accessible to the public or government officials.

 @9RSPPYD  from Illinois  answered…9mos9MO

Depends on why they need to use it. I think the technology should be available but not used to invade people's privacy.

 @9Q5PCYM from Illinois  answered…10mos10MO

No, unless this technology is individualized and limited only to specific individuals whom the government is investigating for suspected criminal activity.

 @9TDHSY2 from Illinois  answered…8mos8MO

Hypothetically, yes. But our government often abuses its power. And facial recognition tracking systems is a lot of power.

 @9W4BS45Republican from Illinois  answered…7mos7MO

I think that they should be able to use the cameras to scan peoples faces but they should only be used if a crime is being solved or hey have a lead and they are trying to find there bad guy. But they cant do it just because they want to.

 @9ZMSPHC from Illinois  answered…6mos6MO

unless there is a way that it can be tightly regulated and used with transparency and humans could not misuse it or be used in a way for the government to control citizens

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...