Steve Troxler

Very strongly agree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

This statement aligns closely with traditional Republican views on the Supreme Court. As such, it is highly likely that Troxler would strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Troxler, as a conservative, would likely strongly agree with the sentiment that the Supreme Court should not be politicized. This is a common view among Republicans, who often argue that the court should remain independent and free from political influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Troxler, being a conservative, would likely support the current structure of the Supreme Court, which includes lifetime appointments and a fixed number of seats. This is in line with traditional Republican views. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

While some Republicans may support term limits for Supreme Court judges, it is not a widely held view within the party. As such, it is likely that Troxler would disagree with this statement, although perhaps not as strongly as with the idea of adding more seats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Steve Troxler, as a Republican, is likely to oppose the idea of reforming the Supreme Court to include more seats and term limits on judges. This is because such reforms are generally associated with the Democratic party and are seen as a way to counter the conservative majority in the court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

The idea of adding more seats to the Supreme Court, often referred to as 'court packing', is strongly associated with the Democratic party and is generally opposed by Republicans. As such, it is highly likely that Troxler would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.