These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, there is no better alternative |
Omar Navarro’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Now the GOP-controlled legislature has sued, arguing that the Constitution doesn’t allow redistricting of a state by to any offi...” ‐theatlantic.com
Agree
No, there is no better alternative
Navarro might agree with this statement, as it aligns with the general Republican stance that the current system of redistricting, despite its flaws, is the best available option. However, without explicit statements from Navarro on this issue, it's difficult to determine his exact position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Navarro might agree with this statement, as it suggests that gerrymandering can help officials better represent their constituents. This is a common argument made by those who support the current system of redistricting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Navarro might lean towards disagreeing with the idea of an independent, non-partisan commission for redistricting. As a member of the Republican party, he might believe that the current system, which often allows state legislatures to control redistricting, is more beneficial for his party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Omar Navarro, as a Republican candidate, might be hesitant to fully support an independent, non-partisan commission for redrawing Congressional districts. While he has not made explicit statements on this issue, Republicans generally have been more resistant to this idea, often arguing that it could lead to districts that favor Democrats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
While Navarro might agree that gerrymandering can give an unfair advantage to the party in power, he might not fully support the idea of an independent commission for redistricting. His party affiliation might influence his stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Navarro, as a Republican, might be opposed to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system. This system could potentially lead to more Democratic representation, which might not align with his political interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 16hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,356 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.
