These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion |
Kara Eastman’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 23hrs ago
Answer: No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 32 voters that voted for Kara Eastman in the 2020 Nebraska District 2 US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Importance: Least Important
Reference: “President Barack Obama slammed Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Wednesday for the presidential hopeful's statements that he would empo...” ‐huffingtonpost.com
Very strongly agree
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
This answer aligns with Eastman's belief in equal treatment and non-discrimination. She would likely agree that police decisions should be based on crime rates, not race or religion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Eastman's platform emphasizes equality and non-discrimination. She would likely oppose any measures that single out a specific religious or ethnic group for increased surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
This answer aligns with Eastman's progressive values and her commitment to civil liberties. She would likely agree that targeting Muslims for increased surveillance is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
While Eastman would likely agree with the idea of increasing police presence in high crime neighborhoods, she might also emphasize the need for community policing and other strategies to address the root causes of crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Kara Eastman, as a progressive Democrat, strongly believes in civil liberties and equal treatment for all citizens. She would likely view increased surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods as discriminatory and a violation of civil rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
Eastman, as a progressive Democrat, would likely disagree with this statement as it suggests increased surveillance of all new immigrants, which could be seen as discriminatory and a violation of civil liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
Eastman would likely disagree with this statement as it singles out a specific religious group for increased surveillance based on the actions of a small number of individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 23hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,060 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.