Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Electoral

Constitution2020 US SenateGeorgia

Brian Slowinski

 

Overview Policies Discuss Ratings Themes Ideology

Brian Slowinski’s policy on foreign lobbying

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Filters

Topics

Should foreign lobbyists be allowed to raise money for American elections?

  Personal answerNo

Brian Slowinski’s answer is based on the following data:

Personal answer

Answer: No

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Brian Slowinski is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on June 16th, 2020

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.

Updated 8hrs ago

Brian Slowinski voters

Answer: No, foreign interests should not be able to buy the influence of our politicians

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 15 voters that voted for Brian Slowinski in the 2020 Georgia US Senate election.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 8hrs ago

Party’s support base

Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No, foreign interests should not be able to buy the influence of our politicians

Importance: More Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 462 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here


Popular conversations

Join in on the post popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…14hrs14H

Trump Targets FAA Diversity Programs In Crash Aftermath

Trump made controversial claims linking diversity initiatives at the FAA to a deadly Potomac River collision that killed 67 people, despite acknowledging he had no evidence to support these assertions.The disability recruitment program Trump criticized actually began during his own administration in April 2019, with the FAA launching a pilot program for 20 people with targeted disabilities to work in air traffic operations.Experts, including Tennessee Garvey from the Organization of Black Aerospace Professionals, stated that no aviation incident has ever been attributed to diversity initiatives as a cause or contributing factor.The federal policy for hiring people with disabilities dates back to the Bush administration in 2003 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which was initially created to protect veterans with disabilities.FAA workforce diversity has shown minimal changes over recent years: white male representation decreased from 58.9% in 2016 to 55.3% in 2023, while employees with targeted disabilities increased from 0.7% to 2%.The aviation industry's diversity efforts were primarily driven by labor shortages and the need to fill positions as pilots retire, rather than purely demographic goals.All candidates, regardless of background or disability status, must meet the same rigorous standards for aptitude, medical qualifications, and security clearances.Historical barriers, including segregation, prevented Black aviation professionals from entering the industry until the civil rights movement and subsequent lawsuits.The Biden administration has continued similar diversity initiatives, with slight increases in representation across different demographic groups.A pending lawsuit filed by a conservative legal organization claims discrimination against applicants due to Obama-era hiring practices, though the case hasn't been resolved.

▲  179 replies