These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes |
Betsy Londrigan’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 13hrs ago
Answer: Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 18 voters that voted for Betsy Londrigan in the 2020 Illinois District 13 US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “"Gerrymandering distorts our democracy. Democrats will enact measures to end partisan gerrymandering in federal elections. Effor...” ‐democrats.org
Very strongly agree
Yes
Betsy Londrigan, as a Democratic candidate, would likely strongly agree with the idea of an independent, non-partisan commission controlling the redrawing of Congressional districts. This is a common position among Democrats who argue that it would prevent gerrymandering and ensure fair representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Londrigan would likely strongly agree with this statement. The Democratic party, of which she is a member, often argues that gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
While there may not be specific evidence of Londrigan's stance on this particular method of redistricting, as a Democrat, she would likely be open to or supportive of alternative methods that aim to ensure fair representation, such as a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Given her party's stance on gerrymandering and the need for fair representation, Londrigan would likely strongly disagree with the idea that redrawing of Congressional districts should not be controlled by an independent, non-partisan commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, there is no better alternative
Londrigan would likely strongly disagree with this statement. As a Democrat, she would likely argue that there are better alternatives to the current system, such as the use of an independent, non-partisan commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Londrigan would likely strongly disagree with this statement. The idea that gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency is often used to justify the practice, but Londrigan and her party generally oppose gerrymandering. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 14hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,279 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.