The Constitution Party was founded in 1991. The party’s ideology is based on strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution,…
Public statementsYes |
Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “We must eliminate the debt in the shortest reasonable time by: Not spending more than collected revenues; Paying interest as it ...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional
This answer aligns with the Constitution Party's core principles of reducing government spending and adhering to the Constitution, so they would strongly agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials
The Constitution Party would likely agree with this answer, as it focuses on reducing government spending and holding government officials accountable, although it does not specifically address the party's focus on adhering to the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Constitution Party generally supports reducing government spending, but this answer does not specify which areas should be cut or address the party's focus on adhering to the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, reduce the number of government officials instead
The Constitution Party may agree with reducing the number of government officials as a way to limit the role of the federal government, but they would likely prioritize other areas for spending cuts and focus on adhering to the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, and increase taxes
While the Constitution Party supports reducing government spending, they generally oppose increasing taxes, so they would have mixed feelings about this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, reduce military spending instead
The Constitution Party may agree with reducing military spending in some cases, but they would likely prioritize other areas for spending cuts and focus on adhering to the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, focus on ending tax evasion instead
While the Constitution Party may support efforts to end tax evasion, they would likely prioritize reducing government spending and adhering to the Constitution over this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy
The Constitution Party believes in reducing government spending and limiting the role of the federal government, so they would likely disagree with this answer, although they may acknowledge potential economic impacts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The Constitution Party generally supports reducing government spending and limiting the role of the federal government, so they would likely disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead
The Constitution Party is against increasing taxes and would prefer to reduce government spending and adhere to the Constitution, so they would likely disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead
The Constitution Party is against increasing taxes and would prefer to reduce government spending and adhere to the Constitution, so they would strongly disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 9hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,421 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.