Proponents argue that it would preserve cultural heritage and appeal to those who value traditional designs. Opponents argue that it would stifle innovation and limit the design freedom of car manufacturers.
15% Yes |
85% No |
15% Yes |
85% No |
See how support for each position on “Traditional Automotive Design” has changed over time for 228 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Traditional Automotive Design” has changed over time for 228 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9MVGZBJ1wk1W
The Government does not need to require. It should be up to the manufacturers.
@9MVCVJH1wk1W
No, what type of question is this? It would look super cool though.
@9MV2QCD1wk1W
Not really, Progress should be allowed and the government should keep its nose out of business and we shouldn't trust the government with cars
@9MS2G3M1wk1W
not, not required, but to make 2 models of each car. One normal then the other having the classic automobile look.
@9MRXBN21wk1W
The decision to preserve classic aesthetics should be encouraged, but the choice ultimately should be up to the manufacturers.
@9MQ8JNS1wk1W
Yes, but only for size of the vehicle for pedestrian safety.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
