Distracted driving penalties aim to deter dangerous behaviors, such as texting while driving, to improve road safety. Proponents argue that it deters dangerous behavior, improves road safety, and reduces accidents caused by distractions. Opponents argue that penalties alone may not be effective and enforcement can be challenging.
70% Yes |
30% No |
70% Yes |
30% No |
See how support for each position on “Distracted Driving Penalties” has changed over time for 210 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Distracted Driving Penalties” has changed over time for 210 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9MPYFLR2wks2W
No, but it should provide tax breaks for buyers of cars with technology that allows drivers to interface with their smartphones via the entertainment system instead of holding their phones in their hands
@9N2J4QC 6 days6D
Yes, depending on the severity of the damage the distracted driver caused unless they can prove it wasn't their fault for the crash.
@8T83KJZ 6 days6D
No. But privatization of the roads would solve this issue through market forces
@9N2FN656 days6D
Yes and fines should be a percentage of income and/or assets. Fines punish the poor and not the rich with the current system.
@snaveretnuh 6 days6D
Yes, if the distracted driving resulted in the death or severe physical injury of another individual
@9MXCZT41wk1W
Only when it leads to a traffic accident or a near miss
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
