The Socialist Party USA was founded in 1973. The party’s ideology is based on full employment, guaranteed income, socialized…
Public statementsNo, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary |
Socialists answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Reference: “An immediate end to the racist profiling of Arab, Muslim and South Asian communities is necessary.” ‐ontheissues.org
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
This answer aligns with the socialist principles of equality and social justice, as it explicitly states that targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
This answer aligns with socialist principles of equality and social justice, as it advocates for basing policing decisions on crime rates rather than race or religion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Socialist parties would generally disagree with increasing surveillance of specific religious or ethnic groups, as it goes against their principles of equality and social justice. However, they may support other measures to address crime and safety concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
Socialist parties may support increased surveillance and patrol of high crime neighborhoods as a way to address crime and safety concerns, but they would likely emphasize the need for additional social programs and resources to address the root causes of crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
While socialist parties may support some measures to address crime and safety concerns, they would likely view increased surveillance of all new immigrants as discriminatory and an infringement on civil liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Socialist political parties generally advocate for equality and social justice, and would likely view increased surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods as discriminatory and unjust. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
Socialist parties would likely view this answer as discriminatory and unjust, as it singles out Muslim neighborhoods for increased surveillance based on the actions of a small minority of extremists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 4 days ago
Socialist Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,440 voters that identify as Socialist.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Socialists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.