ChatGPTYes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory |
No Labels’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory
This answer aligns well with No Labels' commitment to promoting understanding and cooperation among different groups. They would likely support a comprehensive approach to sensitivity training that covers all protected groups and is not based on critical race theory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
No Labels is a bipartisan political organization that promotes pragmatic solutions to issues. They would likely support racial sensitivity training for federal employees as a means to promote understanding and cooperation, but they may not fully endorse it without considering other factors such as cost and effectiveness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and also include LGBTQ+ topics
No Labels would likely support the inclusion of LGBTQ+ topics in racial sensitivity training as part of their commitment to promoting understanding and cooperation among different groups. However, they may not fully endorse it without considering other factors such as cost and effectiveness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination
No Labels might agree with this approach as it emphasizes clear guidelines and accountability for acts of discrimination. However, they might also see the value in proactive measures such as sensitivity training to prevent discrimination from occurring in the first place. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, and extend the requirement to private companies as well
While No Labels might support racial sensitivity training for federal employees, extending this requirement to private companies could be seen as an overreach of government power, which they may not fully support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
No Labels generally supports initiatives that promote understanding and cooperation among different groups. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea of not requiring racial sensitivity training for federal employees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to No Labels’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.