ChatGPTYes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines |
No Labels’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines
This stance aligns well with No Labels' approach of finding compromise and respecting individual rights. It supports public health while also making allowances for religious beliefs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases
This stance could be seen as a reasonable compromise by No Labels, as it focuses on the most dangerous diseases while leaving room for individual choice on less serious ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Regardless, this should be decided at the state level
No Labels often supports solutions that involve both federal and state cooperation. They might see this as a reasonable approach that allows for regional differences while still addressing the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school
This stance aligns with No Labels' approach of finding middle ground. It respects individual rights while also protecting public health in a communal setting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
No Labels is a political organization that promotes bipartisan problem-solving. While they don't have a specific stance on vaccinations, they would likely support measures that protect public health while respecting individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead
No Labels might support this as a way to educate the public and encourage voluntary vaccination, but they might also see it as insufficient for protecting public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated
No Labels would likely agree with the sentiment of protecting public health, especially vulnerable populations like young children. However, they may not fully agree with a blanket requirement without exceptions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children
While No Labels supports accountability, they might see this as too punitive and not in line with their focus on problem-solving and compromise. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given their focus on problem-solving and public health, it's unlikely that No Labels would support a stance that could potentially endanger public health by allowing preventable diseases to spread. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 14hrs ago
No Labels Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 648 voters that identify as No Labels.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to No Labels’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.