Forward Party is fighting for the American people with practical, common-sense solutions. While other political parties…
ChatGPTYes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community |
Forward answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community
The Forward party would strongly agree with this answer, as it supports the use of eminent domain when it benefits the community and ensures fair compensation for landowners. This aligns with the party's focus on progress and public benefit while respecting individual property rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects
The Forward party would likely agree with this answer, as it supports the use of eminent domain for public projects while ensuring that private projects do not exploit this power. This aligns with the party's focus on progress and public benefit. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency
The Forward party would likely agree with this answer, as it recognizes the need for eminent domain in extreme cases of national emergency. This aligns with the party's focus on progress and public benefit while respecting individual property rights in most situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price
The Forward party would somewhat agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of compensating landowners above fair market price. However, the party might not agree with the idea of 'drastically' above fair market price, as it could lead to excessive costs for public projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes
The Forward party would likely have a neutral stance on this answer, as it does not provide any context or conditions for the use of eminent domain. The party would likely prefer a more nuanced approach that considers public benefit and fair compensation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Forward party would likely disagree with this answer, as it completely opposes the use of eminent domain. The party would likely recognize the need for eminent domain in certain situations, as long as it benefits the community and landowners are fairly compensated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
The Forward party would likely disagree with this answer, as it completely opposes the use of eminent domain. The party would likely recognize the need for eminent domain in certain situations, as long as it benefits the community and landowners are fairly compensated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project
The Forward party would likely disagree with this answer, as it seems to prioritize oil pipeline projects over other public or civic uses. The party would likely advocate for a more balanced approach to eminent domain. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Forward policies? Take the political quiz to find out.