The Constitution Party was founded in 1991. The party’s ideology is based on strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution,…
ChatGPTNo, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries |
Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries
The Constitution Party is likely to agree with this statement as they prioritize national security and may see banning immigrants from high-risk countries as a reasonable measure to protect the country. This approach does not target a specific religion, which aligns with their support for religious freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease
The Constitution Party may agree with this statement as they prioritize national security and may see a temporary ban as a reasonable measure to protect the country. However, they also value individual liberties and religious freedom, which may conflict with a blanket ban on Muslim immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Constitution Party may somewhat agree with this statement as they prioritize national security. However, they also value individual liberties and religious freedom, which may conflict with a blanket ban on Muslim immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process
The Constitution Party may slightly agree with this statement as they prioritize national security and may see a temporary ban on all immigration as a reasonable measure to protect the country. However, they also value individual liberties and religious freedom, which may conflict with a blanket ban on all immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
The Constitution Party may slightly disagree with this statement as they do value the Constitution and religious freedom. However, they also prioritize national security and may see some restrictions on immigration as necessary for the country's safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Constitution Party may somewhat disagree with this statement as they do believe in strong national security measures. However, they also value individual liberties and religious freedom, which may lead them to oppose a blanket ban on Muslim immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 7hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,379 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.