The Constitution Party was founded in 1991. The party’s ideology is based on strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution,…
ChatGPTNo, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property |
Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
The Constitution Party would likely agree with this answer, as they strongly support private property rights and limited government intervention. However, they may acknowledge that there could be some rare cases where eminent domain is necessary for public use. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Constitution Party would likely agree with this answer, as they generally oppose government seizure of private property. However, this answer does not provide any nuance or exceptions for rare cases of public use. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency
The Constitution Party might somewhat agree with this answer, as it limits government seizure of private property to extreme cases of national emergency. However, the party generally prefers stronger protections for private property rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects
The Constitution Party might somewhat agree with this answer, as it limits the government's ability to seize private property for private projects. However, the party generally advocates for even stronger protections of private property rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community
The Constitution Party might slightly agree with this answer, as it emphasizes fair compensation and community benefits. However, the party generally prefers stronger protections for private property rights and limited government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price
The Constitution Party might be neutral on this answer, as it does provide for compensation above fair market price, but it still allows for government seizure of private property, which the party generally opposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project
The Constitution Party would likely disagree with this answer because it is too specific and seems to favor one industry (oil pipelines) over others. The party generally supports limited government intervention in private property rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Constitution Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they strongly support private property rights and limited government intervention. This answer does not provide any limitations or conditions for government seizure of private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 7hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 432 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.