Personal answerYes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price |
CA Common Sense Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Common Sense Party is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on September 18th, 2023
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s official answer on this issue.
Strongly agree
Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community
This answer aligns well with the party's platform, which emphasizes the importance of public projects and infrastructure, but also respects private property rights and believes in fair compensation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency
This answer aligns with the party's platform, which emphasizes the importance of public projects and infrastructure in cases of national emergency, but also respects private property rights and believes in fair compensation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects
The party's platform emphasizes the importance of public projects and infrastructure, but also respects private property rights. Therefore, they would likely agree with this statement, but not strongly as they also believe in the importance of individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price
The party values fair compensation for private property owners, but this answer suggests an excessively high compensation that may not align with the party's emphasis on fiscal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes
While the party recognizes the need for public projects and infrastructure, this answer does not specify any conditions or limitations, which may not align with the party's emphasis on individual rights and fair compensation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The party values individual rights and property rights, but also understands the need for public projects and infrastructure. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this absolute prohibition on government seizure of private property.
Disagree
No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
While the party values individual rights and property rights, they also understand the need for public projects and infrastructure. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this absolute prohibition on government seizure of private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project
The Common Sense Party of California does not specifically advocate for oil pipeline projects over other types of public projects. Their platform emphasizes fiscal responsibility, environmental stewardship, and individual rights, which may not align with the specific exception of oil pipelines. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to CA Common Sense Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.