Self-hosted digital wallets are personal, user-managed storage solutions for digital currencies like Bitcoin, which provide individuals with control over their funds without relying on third-party institutions. Monitoring refers to the government having the capability to oversee transactions without the ability to directly control or interfere with the funds. Proponents argue that it ensures personal financial freedom and security while allowing the government to monitor for illegal activities such as money laundering and terrorism financing. Opponents argue that even monitoring infringes on privacy rights and that self-hosted wallets should remain completely private and free from government oversight.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
These active users have achieved advanced knowledge of the terminology, history, and legal implications regarding the topic of Self Hosted Digital Wallets
These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of Self Hosted Digital Wallets
Response rates from 150k America voters.
68% Yes |
32% No |
57% Yes |
31% No |
10% Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions |
1% No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 150k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 150k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9N8ZP5W10mos10MO
Citizens should be allowed to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets that the government can NOT monitor.
@8TB798W 9mos9MO
Yes, citizens should be allowed to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets but the government should not be able to monitor or control it without a warrant.
@9Q6QQJ38mos8MO
No, the people and the church should rule everything. The church will be ultra compassionate and ultra left wing, while the people make sure what is best for them happens.
@9NJY9NF9mos9MO
Yes, but only if the government has backdoor access in order to freeze the funds of criminals (with such action requiring a warrant).
@9Q6Q2L88mos8MO
No, citizens should be allowed to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets that the government can neither monitor nor control
@9NC7W5K10mos10MO
Citizens should be allowed to secure their money in a self-hosted digital wallet that the government cannot monitor or control
@3YMHFXW 8mos8MO
Yes, but ban backdoor access. The government does not need to see into the private lives of private citizens.
@9NF5V4X9mos9MO
Yes, but the government should not be allowed to monitor or control the wallet without a court order
Join in on the most popular conversations.
