@ISIDEWITHQuestionstransportationStarted 9mos agoActive 2 days ago

Should the government enforce mandatory GPS tracking in all vehicles to monitor driving behavior and improve road safety?

Mandatory GPS tracking involves using GPS technology in all vehicles to monitor driving behavior and improve road safety. Proponents argue that it enhances road safety and reduces accidents by monitoring and correcting dangerous driving behaviors. Opponents argue that it infringes on personal privacy and could lead to government overreach and misuse of data.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 13.2k America voters.

10%
Yes
90%
No
10%
Yes
90%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 13.2k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 13.2k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9V8GHCH from Idaho  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, only to people with a history of reckless driving, drunk driving, or any kind of driving that puts others at risk.

 @B2RVR3N from Texas  answered…2 days2D

depends on how its used, as long as a person is not monitoring the driver than its ok and instead it should just record and only check if necessary directly from the device

 @9WXG3RT  from Pennsylvania  answered…3wks3W

No, only for people with a history of distracted, reckless, drunk or any risky driving, or with a history of drug/alcohol addiction.

 @B2FXGFQ from Virginia  answered…3wks3W

They should require patrol cars to have their lights on when they're sitting by the side of the road watching for unsafe driving instead.

 @9WXG3RT  from Pennsylvania  answered…3wks3W

No, only for people with a history of distracted/reckless/drunk or any risky driving, or with a history of drug/alcohol addiction.

 @B28T4S4 from Oklahoma  answered…1mo1MO

No, make it a voluntary program offered by private insurance companies that then share data with the government

 @B25JYKN from Minnesota  answered…2mos2MO

I think that It'll be helpful but not really a good thing, the reason why I say this is because it would be safe but some may feel uncomfortable with why the government has to track their car.

 @B2CFW69 from Texas  answered…4wks4W

A certain amount of monitoring is necessary but too much is overkill, there is a safe zone that I'm not entire sure about.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…10hrs10H

Trump Demands List of All January 6 FBI Agents

FBI has provided the Justice Department with details of roughly 5,000 employees who worked on January 6 investigations, including employee IDs and job roles.Acting Deputy AG Emil Bove issued a memo titled "Terminations" demanding this information with a Tuesday deadline, following his earlier firing of eight senior FBI officials.Elon Musk representatives have been spotted at FBI headquarters as part of Trump's new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).Several FBI employees have filed a class-action lawsuit against the Justice Department, claiming constitutional and privacy law violations.The lawsuit alleges the data collection is meant to intimidate FBI personnel and discourage reporting of future Trump-related malfeasance.Agents were required to complete surveys detailing their involvement in January 6 cases, including arrests, grand jury work, and trial testimony.The initiative has faced resistance from agents working with new administration officials on cultural changes at FBI headquarters.FBI Director nominee Kash Patel promised during Senate testimony that agents wouldn't face political retribution.Agent groups have reached out to congressional Republicans seeking protection from political retaliation.The submitted information covers about 5,000 employees out of more than 38,000 total FBI personnel.

▲  248 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…13hrs13H

Jon Stewart Begs Democrats To ‘Please Stop Trotting Out Chuck Schumer!'

Jon Stewart criticized Democrats for repeatedly using Chuck Schumer as their spokesperson against Trump, calling his performances ineffective and monotonous.Stewart mocked Schumer's response to Trump's trade war threats, particularly his simplistic explanation about Mexican imports like Corona beer and avocados.The former Daily Show host expressed frustration at Schumer's basic observation that "guacamole is made of avocados" as a response to complex trade policy issues.Stewart sarcastically highlighted the Democrats' poor strategic choice in selecting Schumer to counter Trump, whom he described as "one of the most savvy presidential media manipulators in history."The comedian ridiculed Schumer's appearance and presentation style, particularly mocking his use of reading glasses positioned low on his nose.Stewart's criticism centered on the Democratic leadership's judgment in repeatedly choosing an "uninteresting" and "monotone" spokesperson.The commentary addressed Trump's threats of tariffs against Canada and Mexico, though focused more on the Democratic response than the policy itself.Stewart used hyperbole to emphasize his point, stating that Schumer's speaking makes him "want to bomb Canada."The piece highlighted the perceived disconnect between Democratic messaging strategy and effective opposition to Trump's policies.Stewart's criticism suggested a broader frustration with Democratic leadership's media strategy and public presentation.

▲  4817 replies

Active 2hrs ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2hrs2H

Congress Calls Trump's Gaza Plan "Bizarre And Incoherent"

Trump proposed unprecedented U.S. control of Gaza Strip during a White House press conference with Netanyahu, suggesting "long-term ownership" that could last 10-15 years.The plan calls for nearly two million Palestinian residents to permanently relocate to neighboring countries, marking a dramatic shift from decades of U.S. policy.Congressional leaders from both parties expressed skepticism, with even Trump ally Lindsey Graham calling the proposal "problematic."Middle East experts, including former Palestinian Authority advisor Khaled Elgindy, criticized the plan as "bizarre and incoherent."White House officials argue mass relocation is the only viable option and seek to convince Egypt and Jordan to accept displaced Palestinians.The administration estimates Gaza reconstruction would take 10-15 years, far longer than the 3-5 years outlined in cease-fire agreements.The proposal lacks clear details on how to handle Palestinian resistance to relocation or potential U.S. military deployment.Saudi Arabia immediately rejected the plan, stating it wouldn't normalize ties with Israel without a clear path to Palestinian statehood.Trump expressed uncertainty about the current cease-fire's durability while presenting his proposal.The plan faces significant implementation challenges and could complicate other regional objectives, including Israel-Saudi normalization efforts.

▲  1019 replies