+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 14.1k America voters.

10%
Yes
90%
No
10%
Yes
90%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 14.1k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 14.1k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9V8GHCH from Idaho  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, only to people with a history of reckless driving, drunk driving, or any kind of driving that puts others at risk.

 @B3LYKST from Kansas  answered…1wk1W

Yes, for GPS tracking but only in case of accidents or breakdowns in which the driver doesn't know their location

 @B3D9CQD from Georgia  answered…2wks2W

no and yes because it can help people who are kidnapped or people who stole cars instead of wating for someone to look for it or them.

 @B362FJ8 from Idaho  answered…3wks3W

I think GPS tracking should be in the vehicles of people who have already been convicted of driving crimes, like DUIs and Hit and Runs.

 @B28T4S4 from Oklahoma  answered…2mos2MO

No, make it a voluntary program offered by private insurance companies that then share data with the government

 @B25JYKN from Minnesota  answered…3mos3MO

I think that It'll be helpful but not really a good thing, the reason why I say this is because it would be safe but some may feel uncomfortable with why the government has to track their car.

 @B3HRN6V from Texas  answered…2wks2W

Yes, only if the data gathered is ONLY used and HANDLED to improve road safety. It should be a personal choice instead of mandatory.

 @B3GT2Q9 from Pennsylvania  answered…2wks2W

I think they should when you hit a certain age. In terms of getting older and when you are a young driver. From ages 23-50 you could be driving on your own.