+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 12.4k America voters.

44%
Yes
56%
No
44%
Yes
56%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 12.4k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 12.4k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9M3KVCG from Florida  answered…9mos9MO

Only some weapons... ... and I think that they should be able to be guided by artificial AND human intelligence - human intelligence first.

 @9LFRY89 from North Carolina  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, but only when the artificial intelligence is completely ready and foolproof, and it shouldn't be used for all weapons.

 @B2R59XN from Pennsylvania  answered…3 days3D

Yes, but enhanced security mechanisms and oversight are essential to prevent miscalculations and mismanagement of the military tool.

 @9XNVT5Q  from Virginia  answered…4 days4D

No, but if there is undeniable evidence that China or Russia are using these technologies and they are working, we should adopt them. A system similar to Fallout's V.A.T.S. would be nice.

 @LoopedCheese1  from New Jersey  answered…5 days5D

If they prove efficient, maybe. However, I am worried by the fact that they might not recognize the difference between a combatant or a civilian. If there is proof that there will be no mishaps, then I can get behind the idea

 @B2PKSBH from Arizona  answered…6 days6D

No, not until there is more research and development into the technology to ensure no preventable tragedies occur

 @B2LXPXZ from Missouri  answered…1wk1W

We already do, there is an ongoing debate about whether or not AI should be able to "pull the trigger". Currently, AI targeting on weapons systems requires a human to tell it to fire.

 @B2LP44T from Massachusetts  answered…1wk1W

I guess if its well educated with the situation is in the country and knows the right threats then yes but if its just there than there nothing to do with them.