Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Private Prisons

2.3k Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...6yrs6Y

No

 @9FNKP8F from Virginia  agreed…1yr1Y

Studies estimate that between 4-6% of people incarcerated in US prisons are actually innocent. If 5% of individuals are actually innocent, that means 1/20 criminal cases result in a wrongful conviction.

 @97ZFPQ6Democrat from Washington  agreed…2yrs2Y

Private prisons make their owners wealthier by getting more prisoners and spending less on them.

Public prisons are accountable to the voters.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...6yrs6Y

No, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

 @ARCSocialist from California  agreed…1yr1Y

Non-private prisons don't have a profit incentive to keeping people in jail, and in other countries with non-private prisons, the reaffending rate is lower.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...6yrs6Y

Yes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption

 @9LXF4HS from Nebraska  disagreed…11mos11MO

Prisons should be about rehabilitation for the individuals, not profit. Private Prisons can't be trusted to not want to turn a profit.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...6yrs6Y

Yes

 @9G3PFDJ from Maine  disagreed…1yr1Y

If we privatize prisons, we lose oversight over what happens in them, and criminal activity is more likely WITHIN the prison

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...6yrs6Y

Yes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quotas

 @9FNKP8F from Virginia  disagreed…1yr1Y

I feel like with these private prisons there will be more wrongful convictions just to make profit on these so called criminal's

 @ARCSocialist from California  disagreed…1yr1Y

Even without a mandated quota, more prisoners equals more money. Any Private jail will seek to incarcerate as many people for as long as they can, because at the end of the day, they're a business.

 @8D7X8VBNew Liberty from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

No, private companies want to grow and they grow with more inmates. A viscous cycle that private companies will take advantage of for their gain ... not what is morally right.

 @8MNR3M5Democrat from Indiana  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8JCJLFZ from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

Regardless, funding should be given based on how well prisons rehabilitate convicts.

  @Parrot  from GU  answered…5mos5MO

No, only non-profit or state owned enterprises should be allowed to operate prisons. Prisons by default should be ran for profit or at least break even.

 @9DNTZZ8 from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

Regardless, prisons should be regulated well enough to not qualify as cruel punishment.

 @8J9KPHM from Oregon  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PYGY3H from South Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8GW4VVJLibertarian from Tennessee  answered…4yrs4Y

Government shouldn't hire anything, allow private prisons to operate without aid of government.

 @7PTCG38Democrat from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

No, private prisons will emphasize contractual occupancy quotas and profit over all other factors

 @B35C8WLfrom Guam  answered…3wks3W

Should Australian prime minister is video recording and reports any damages over tips with hands on profits quality in cares good tracked hands on rehabilitation skills issued by Canadian government prime minister agreed more rehabs and prisoners locked

 @B2R2KKJConstitutionfrom Maine  answered…1mo1MO

Yes, but private prison companies should be broken into small and medium sized businesses or cooperatives and they should pay their workers a fair living wage

 @B2Q9CDP from Oregon  answered…1mo1MO

I don’t care as long as they do a good job and it’s the government’s choice but people can peacefully educate the government.

 @B2LRJF5 from New Hampshire  answered…2mos2MO

yes, but with strict oversight and they should not be able to lobby government in a way that'd benefit them by having more prisoners

 @B2H9ZKL from Texas  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, but they should end strictly regulated to prevent rehabilitation services profit, No, Private prisons will sacrifice quality of life and rehabilitation services for profit

 @B2D6VXV from New Mexico  answered…2mos2MO

Abolish prisons entirely. Time is a dangerous thing to take from people, it is a currency one cannot take back. Putting someone in a hole for many years does nothing to rehabilitate them, it is a punishment that only takes from everyone. Prisons are not meant as a punishment, only holding people for their punishment. Execute extreme criminals, use lesser crime-doers as indentured servants for a limited time.

 @B25VGF9No Labels from Indiana  answered…3mos3MO

I don’t think it would be terrible to try, but if there are immense complaints then it should be reversed.

 @B24D5LP from Utah  answered…3mos3MO

Keeping it in-house but trimming the fat, so to speak, to make is as cost effective, or more cost effective, with additional regulation. Also, as far as decreasing spending examples- There should be treadmills and yoga but not weights in prisons.

 @B23YYX9  from Nebraska  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, but I don't think it shouldn't be for-profit, because for-profit can lead them to be money-driven and incarcerate more people and punish people instead of helping them/rehabilitation.

 @9ZZ2C23 from Nebraska  answered…3mos3MO

no, they need to monitor are prison systems on a regular basis, cause they don’t rehabilitate people they make good people bad and bad people worse. Some sentences are just way to long.

  @KindredburkeLibertarian  from Michigan  answered…5mos5MO

Both government run and private prisons lead to forms of slavery and torture. Prisons should only exist for people who committed violent crimes, felonies or large-scale crime. They should be run by either the government or private companies but should be closely monitored by a 3rd party to ensure the prisoners' rights are not being violated.

 @9RHYD7S from Michigan  answered…8mos8MO

No, prisons are owned by the nation and by states and should remain run by their respective governments

 @6YGTH6XLibertarian  from Texas  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, but provide incentives to reduce recidivism, such as financial incentives for successful job placement once prisoners are released.

 @9R6H2FTRepublican from Ohio  answered…8mos8MO

No, I don’t have much knowledge on the subject but based on what information is shown here it sounds to me like such prisons have too much incentive to fill themselves up — think about that one a while…

 @9R4JJV6 from Nevada  answered…8mos8MO

No, but the government should disregard creature comforts and freedoms for prisoners and spend the bare minimum to keep prisoners alive but not comfortable

 @9QW27ZB from Tennessee  answered…8mos8MO

The government should ban prison on our American soil and move them all to an island they can't escape from or we don't have to pay for out of our taxes..or frontlines of war .we need to figure a way to save the hard working americans money so we can live .

 @9QTV3ZDIndependent from Massachusetts  answered…8mos8MO

prisons should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption, whether private or government run, they should be focus on rehabilitation services for those who are estimated to have the opportunity to be rehabilitated.

 @3H6X5RQLibertarian answered…8mos8MO

Yes. However, privately run incarceration systems should profit solely on rehabilitation and education rates and penalized on recidivism rates.

 @9PLXGMYfrom Virgin Islands  answered…9mos9MO

No, the State should sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation for profit, not the private companies

 @9NXW9RJ  from Utah  answered…9mos9MO

No. We need to focus on restoring justice to the victims and having the criminals take responsibility for the crimes they committed.

 @9NPCMJ3 from Colorado  answered…9mos9MO

No, private prisons have to keep an minimum occupancy rates, and are a drain on taxes payer's dollars.

 @9NLS7B6 from Ohio  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, however prisons should be heavily regulated and goods created by prison inmates should be listed on market and prisoners should be able to make a living wage that would be placed in holding until their sentence has ended.

 @9NCY427 from Virginia  answered…10mos10MO

yes but with bonuses for lack of recidivism at major milestones (ie 1, 3, 5, 10 years) and punitive monetary damages for recidivism.

 @9MZC778Libertarian from Virginia  answered…10mos10MO

No as currently practiced, but if we can shift the contracts to reward reductions un recitivism I could support them.

 @9MYY7PJ from Pennsylvania  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, but only if they can be ran cheaper, but they should be regulated to prevent corruption, ensure prisons are kept clean, prisoners are kept safe, and no rights are violated. Governments should still provide wrap around services and rehab programs

 @9MQ8NG5 from New York  answered…10mos10MO

No, the private companies should bid for the jobs and pay the government if they want to operate prisons

 @9MMFF3Pfrom Montana  answered…10mos10MO

..well isn’t there already private prisons maybe just military, which btw should just be strictly regulated to prevent mistreatment and corruption

 @9MDD3XT from Texas  answered…10mos10MO

No this is ludicrous, and this should be stopped and non violent criminals who fueled these profit centers should be released.

 @JakeRVN01  from Ohio  answered…10mos10MO

No, I don’t think there can be a truly effective private prison system. It’s one thing the government does better.

 @9M7X92J from North Dakota  answered…10mos10MO

In this generation private prisons have been a wide open door for corruption.
Until we can see these prisions responsibly administered on a regular and consistently good basis we should not allow private corporations into our prison systems.
As of right now there has been way to much abuse and outright corruption.
I don't think that we are responsible enough on any end for private corporations to run these government programs in the current ways that they have been allowed to.
Maybe when the public gets back into the Bible and starts caring about the prisoners and other vulnerable populations we can try again.
But please keep in mind that the prisoners have no say in this current system nor do their families, and the prisoners are being treated as commodities to be profited off of.

 @9M7HHM5 from Florida  answered…10mos10MO

No, instead, prisons should be managed by both the government and organizations that are committed to rehabilitating convicts

 @9LYDXC8  from Utah  answered…11mos11MO

Yes, but only if the court these prisoners were convicted of are also run by private companies. If not, the government should be responsible themselves for the citizens they declare to be guilty of imprisonment.

 @9L4Z23BIndependent  from Pennsylvania  answered…11mos11MO

If they can be ran cheaper then yes, but they should be regulated to prevent corruption, ensure prisons are kept clean, prisoners are kept safe, and no rights are violated

 @9KKGQVQGreen from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

No, private prisons sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit and incentivize judicial misconduct

 @9KJRV9FIndependent  from California  answered…1yr1Y

No, prison systems are already corrupt, privatizing them will only incentivize the current issues for profit.

 @9KHD9C8 from Idaho  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but States should handle their own system of corrections at all levels and determine the best way, public or private.

 @9KGSD9S from California  answered…1yr1Y

yes, only if private prisons are cheaper than public prisons. if private prisons are more expensive, then no

 @9KB3JWZ from Washington  answered…1yr1Y

Yes but remove any quotas and require that employees treat inmates with mutual respect as much as possible, these are still humans regardless of charges

 @9JZMW2C from Tennessee  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, and they should be strictly regulated, but public prisons should make up the majority of incarceration facilities.

  @charlie3sticks from Guam  answered…1yr1Y

Should the state incentivize incarceration by privatizing institutional violence? I think not, but again, British East India Company was traded on British stock exchange so this satanic compulsion towards violence seems more like a feature than a bug in western “democracy”

 @9JPK8PT from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but the government should provide incentives for prisons with the best-cared for prisoners, and by utilizing those better prisons, the prisons have a competitive drive to improve themselves.

 @9JPFXR2Libertarian from Georgia  answered…1yr1Y

Regardless, prisons should be for rehabilitation and corrections not punishment. the manor in which this is achieved is irrelevant, though i prefer private institutions not public.

 @9JNB58X from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but with the caveat that incentives should be geared towards excellence and recidivism rates, not quotas. Any work opportunities for inmates should be paid and strictly voluntary.

 @9HS4TXQ from New Hampshire  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but compensate them based on how well they rehabilitate the inmates, rather than how many inmates they are housing

 @9HCR2ZB from Arkansas  answered…1yr1Y

The government needs to completely reform the prison system because it sucks and provides very little real beneficial form of rehabilitation.

 @9HBPWST from Georgia  answered…1yr1Y

no prisoners shouldn't even be taken care of let alone spend more money on private officers just lock them up

 @9H73QHGConstitution from Massachusetts  answered…1yr1Y

No, collusion between government and business should not occur especially regarding law enforcement and imprisonment

 @9H468F6 from Nevada  answered…1yr1Y

Yes. But Prívate prisons should be managed and actually take care of the prisoners and help them build a life after and prevent reoccurring sentences causing humans to be deemed as a paycheck for them

 @9H43KT7 from Massachusetts  answered…1yr1Y

No, collusion between businesses and the government should not occur under any reason or crcumstance

 @9H3SQM8Libertarian  from Alabama  answered…1yr1Y

I think maybe a mix of both types. Let us see which works best. Both systems should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption

 @9GY2P7X from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

Yes and No, because prisons should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption but private companies that are running prisons could sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for their own profit

 @9GWDZ64  from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only to address overcrowding in existing publicly-owned institutions and only if regulated to prevent corruption and mismanagement

 @9GW587M from Missouri  answered…1yr1Y

It should be an option in the market place so long as private prisons are strictly regulated to ensure inmate safety and health and to prevent mismanagement and corruption.

 @9GVVJ6F from Ohio  answered…1yr1Y

Private prisons should be allowed but they should still have the full amount of rules and still be as strict and guarded as government controlled prisons.

 @9GS95JF  from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

yes, so that the government can correctly deal with the dangerous prisoners without getting their hands dirty.

 @9GL79K4  from California  answered…1yr1Y

Yes but it also depends on the person who is running the private institution, as they have the power to either better or worsen the prisons and immates' health.

 @9GJDXKD from Washington  answered…1yr1Y

Eliminate contractual occupancy quotas. Private prisons will sacrifice quality of care for government profit.

 @9GCCK9M from California  answered…1yr1Y

If the private companies are paying for everything then yeah but I'm sure they would use our taxpayer dollars so No. Also, I'd need to do more research on that.

 @9G9F93L from Iowa  answered…1yr1Y

Private companies should never be allowed to be in a position where they control the lives of other human beings. This is abhorrent and absolutely disgusting.

 @9G8LVV8Republican from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

I feel all prisons should be run by people who can help rehab all prisoners even those with a life sentence. I feel if they have a purpose when and if they get out there may be less of a chance they will reoffend. I also feel when they get out they should be given help to find housing and to get and keep a job. I also feel if they have a purpose there may be less violence in the prisons.

 @9FVPFB6Independent  from Indiana  answered…1yr1Y

No, but a third party that is independent and nonpartisan should regularly audit prisons for quality of care to staff and prisoners as well as compliance with regulations and policies.

 @9FQNDHRConstitution from Ohio  answered…1yr1Y

All private prisons should be abolished and placed under the control of the state or city they reside in, or the federal prison system

 @LucidKarmaIndependent  from Arizona  answered…1yr1Y

No, we should build more private prisons available to reduce criminal over-occupancy but they should not be hired by the government

 @9FPCDYDCA Common Sense from Oregon  answered…1yr1Y

No, government prosecutes them and should remain tasked at supervising their incarceration.

 @9D5Q3V2from Idaho  answered…2yrs2Y

No, prisoners should be given jobs that generate income. That income will then pay their room and board, and then addtionaly any extra's like education or training. the only thing shat should be government funded is rehab programs and security.

 @9D3S73V from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9D3RX82 from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

 @8F5PD86Republican from Minnesota  answered…4yrs4Y

Prisons should be self sufficient. Prisoners should have to work for room and board.

 @9ZKT945 from Massachusetts  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quota and are subject to strict regulation to prevent mismanagement, abuse and corruption.

 @9YM3RWF from Missouri  answered…4mos4MO

I believe that the system of prisons is for now as it should be. Adding in the private companies might interfere with the system.

 @9XYNTH7No Labels from Louisiana  answered…4mos4MO

yes but they shouldn't have occupancy quotas and should be regulated to prevent corruption and mismanagement

 @9XHFG4X from New York  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but as sparingly as we can, we extensive oversight and regulation with teeth discourage mismanagement and corruption. Also eliminate quotas.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...