In the 2010 Supreme Court case Citizens United vs FEC, court ruled that the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibited the government from restricting independent expenditures for political campaigns by corporations, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other associations. The court’s landmark decision overturned the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, also known as “McCain-Feingold.” That law had prohibited unregulated contributions to national political parties and limited the use of corporate and union money to fund advertisements discussing political issues within 60 days of a general election.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 1.2k Congressional District 3 voters.
42% 是的 |
58% 不 |
34% 是的 |
51% 不 |
8% 是的，但应限制其捐赠金额 |
3% 不，政治运动应该由公共资助 |
3% 不，这种类型的捐赠只能变成贿赂 |
|
2% 不，但应允许工会和非营利组织的捐款 |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.2k Congressional District 3 voters.
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.2k Congressional District 3 voters.
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Congressional District 3 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@8RB8LR24yrs4Y
Yes, but apply a very strict regulation and limitation on that.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Campaign Finance” news articles, updated frequently.
