@ISIDEWITHQuestionsForeign policy11yrs ago

美国是否应该继续 NSA 对美国盟国的监听？

文件由前国家安全局承办爱德华·斯诺登透露缓存透露，美国使用监视的方法来监视电子邮件和它最接近的外国盟友，包括德国，法国和巴西的电话。该爆料已经严重破坏了美国同即使国务院官员坚持认为这些监测方案已挫败了许多恐怖威胁的全球这些国家的关系。

+
扩大
+ 设置 x  Anti-Capitalism

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 25k Anti-Capitalism voters.

18%
是的
82%
不
12%
是的
47%
不
6%
是的，监视所有异国的情况对跟踪潜在的恐怖袭击威胁是必不可少的。
27%
不应该，暗中监视我们的盟友会严重损害我们在国外的声誉
8%
不，并且废除国家安全局

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 25k Anti-Capitalism voters.

正在载入数据......

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 25k Anti-Capitalism voters.

正在载入数据......

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Anti-Capitalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8RB8LR2from Guam  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but we have to get permission from our allies first.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “NSA Surveillance” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…10mos10MO

FBI Wanted "Back Door" On Telegram Text App To Spy On Users

The US government had wanted a backdoor to Telegram in order to potentially spy on its users, the social media platform’s founder Pavel Durov said in an interview with American journalist Tucker Carlson. The attention from the FBI was one of the reasons Durov dropped the idea of setting up the company in San Francisco, he said. Born in St Petersburg, Durov first founded VK, Russia’s answer to Facebook, together with his mathematician brother Nikolay. The brothers later developed the Telegram messaging service and social media platform, which describes itself as one of the safest and well-protected communication tools.urov sold his stake in VK and left Russia in 2014 due to disagreements with the government. He lived in several countries while looking for the best place to run Telegram from, and ultimately settled in Dubai. In an interview published on Wednesday, Durov said that he visited the US several times and even met with former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. He was under the watchful eye of the FBI, which made his stays in America uneasy, he said. “We got too much attention from the FBI, the security agencies, wherever we came,” Durov told Carlson, describing the experience as “alarming.” According to Durov, one of his top employees once told him that he had been approached by the US government. “There was a secret attempt to hire my engineer behind my back by cybersecurity officers,” the businessman said.“They were trying to persuade him to use certain open-source tools that he would then integrate into Telegram’s code that, in my understanding, would serve as backdoors,” Durov said. He added that he believes the employee’s account. “There is no reason for my engineer to make up (such) stories.”Durov went on to say that he also had “personally experienced similar pressure” in America, where law enforcement officials approached him on multiple occasions.

 @ThrilledB4llotBox from New York submitted…10mos10MO

Banning TikTok is a Power Grab for the Deep State

If the bill's supporters get what they want, millions of Americans would find their ability to access TikTok terminated by the government, just in time for the November 2024 election. This radical state intervention was endorsed last week by the House Energy and Commerce Committee in a unanimous 50-0 vote, establishing a coveted bipartisan consensus in favor of expelling American users from their preferred social media platform. This extreme action is to be carried out, as usual, in the alleged name of "national security," and to more aggressively combat perceived "foreign adversaries."The bill names TikTok as a "foreign adversary controlled application," with the "adversary" in question being China, but it also goes further and prohibits "applications" associated with the standard litany of official U.S. "adversaries"—Russia, North Korea, and Iran. More additions to the list are always possible, perhaps in the event that Cuba or Venezuela develop a short-form dance video app that becomes suspiciously popular with American teens.Another provision authorizes the President, who is currently Joe Biden and may soon be Donald Trump, to make unilateral determinations about whether certain applications "present a significant threat to the national security of the United States," and therefore must be banned like TikTok. The criteria for making such a determination is left conspicuously vague.So if you really want to give Biden or Trump more unilateral power to control the proliferation of content online, this appears to be just the bill for you.