@ISIDEWITHQuestions社会问题9yrs ago

“性别认同”是否应被加入到反歧视法？

性别认同被定义为自己的个人观念为男性，女性，两者或两者都不是。在2014年，美国总统奥巴马签署了一项行政命令性取向或性别认同的联邦承包商之间的基础上禁止歧视。该订单包括雇主谁执行联邦政府的工作，保护美国工人估计有20％。反对者包括宗教团体，谁认为该命令不会阻止他们接受联邦资金或合同如果不能满足，因为他们的信仰的新的指导方针。支持者认为，该命令是为了保护数百万LGBT人士的权利之后，最高法院在伯韦尔诉业余爱好大堂商店裁定的情况下受到威胁的。在该判决中，法院表示，随着宗教反对家庭经营的企业可以从避孕为员工提供保险予以豁免。

+
扩大
+ 设置 x  Michael Frerichs

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Expert Pundits

These active users have achieved advanced knowledge of the terminology, history, and legal implications regarding the topic of 性别认同

@74YLG5W
#1 Expert Pundit
@Renaldo-Moon
#2 Expert Pundit

Informed Voters

These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of 性别认同

@Detour-Ahead
#1 Informed Voter
@9YL5CYJ
#2 Informed Voter

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of 性别认同

@99G5GNZ
#1 Engaged Voter
Test Your Knowledge

Answer Overview

Response rates from 221 Michael Frerichs voters.

88%
是的
12%
不
71%
是的
9%
不
17%
是的，政府应该采取更多措施防止歧视少数族裔
2%
No, we should address gender identity as a mental health issue and provide funds for more research and care
1%
不，遗传学而不是心理学决定了只有两种性别
0%
不，并应废除私人公司反歧视法律

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 221 Michael Frerichs voters.

正在载入数据......

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 221 Michael Frerichs voters.

正在载入数据......

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Michael Frerichs voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Gender Identity” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…9mos9MO

Scotland’s "hate speech law" sparks global outrage

A new Scottish law that criminalizes the “stirring up of” hatred against some groups has triggered a debate far beyond its borders, pitting human rights activists who say it’s needed against a rising tide of harassment and violence against conservative celebrities and politicians who say the law threatens free speech.Scotland’s law, enacted last week, makes it an imprisonable offense to incite hatred on the basis of race, religion, transgender identity, sexual orientation, age or disability.“If … it’s intended to stir up hatred because of their membership of that group, then that is a criminal offense,” Nick McKerrell, a senior law lecturer at Glasgow Caledonian University, said in a telephone interview Monday. In Scotland, prosecutors recorded 1,884 hate crime charges relating to sexual identity in 2022-23 — representing an eighth consecutive year-on-year increase — in addition to 55 charges relating to transgender identity.Rights groups say the change is a much-needed extension of hate crime protections, consolidating them into a single statute for the first time. Its opponents — including Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling — say they are concerned that the protections are so broad that they could unfairly criminalize free expression. (Critics have also argued that women should be listed as a protected category, too; the Scottish government says it intends to do this through separate legislation.)The furor underlines the polarizing impact of attempts by legislators around the world to find a balance. Backlash to the law has been so fierce that it reportedly prompted far-right agitators to flood police with crime reports to overwhelm them in protest.Legal experts and the Scottish government say the threshold for criminality is high enough to prevent the stifling of debate, pointing out that the law cannot be used to censor jokes or views that are offensive or shocking.“The test is that it has got to be threatening or abusive to someone, or it has to cause them fear or alarm,” McKerrell said. “That’s a very high threshold.”In a series of social media posts, which misgendered trans women and mocked their physical appearance, Rowling — who lives in Scotland — wrote that “freedom of speech and belief are at an end … if the accurate description of biological sex is deemed criminal,” and dared Scottish police to arrest her “if what I’ve written here qualifies as an offense.”Rowling’s remarks last week drew condemnation from rights groups — Stonewall, Britain’s largest LGBTQ charity, said they “trivialise the very real violence committed against us.” Scottish police said Rowling’s comments were “not assessed to be criminal and no further action will be taken,” the Associated Press reported.Scotland’s leader, Humza Yousaf, told the BBC the newly created offenses “have a very high threshold for criminality.”“JK Rowling’s tweets may well be offensive, upsetting and insulting to trans people,” Yousaf said, “but it doesn’t mean that they meet a threshold of criminality of being threatening or abusive and intending to stir up hatred.”Outside Britain, Elon Musk and Joe Rogan were among the high-profile celebrities to critique the legislation. In an episode of his podcast last month, Rogan described the new law as “ridiculous” and incorrectly suggested that it empowered Scottish police to specifically target comedians.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…7mos7MO

Biden Turns Title IX Into a Weapon Against Women and Girls

The Biden administration’s Title IX rule, which the Education Department published on April 29, is a looming disaster for women and girls. Virtually every school in the nation that takes federal money will now have to allow boys who identify as girls to enter girls’ physical-education classes, locker rooms, showers and bathrooms. Schools will be compelled to disregard the rights of women and girls in favor of a male’s subjective and sometimes temporary feelings. It demands that students, teachers and administrators go along with the lies of gender ideology, which are harming countless students today. Anyone who resists will be exposed to investigations, punishment or firing.Before this rule, the trend of men using women’s locker rooms, showers and bathrooms—and taking women’s titles, trophies and scholarships in athletic competitions—was only a partial reality, relegated to certain left-leaning states and school districts. No longer. With its sweeping decision to reinterpret “sex” discrimination to include “gender identity” in Title IX, the administration has opened the floodgates for males to enter female spaces nationwide.Among the most obvious, this rule is lawless. It twists the language of Title IX, the landmark civil-rights law that created equal opportunities for women, by redefining the meaning of sex discrimination. The administration seeks to include the concept of “gender identity” within it—never mind that even today it is widely recognized that “sex” (based on biology) is very different from “gender identity” (based on subjective, internal perceptions).