Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 40.2k Congressional District 2 voters.
47% 是的 |
53% 不 |
42% 是的 |
36% 不 |
4% 是的,禁止所有移民,直到政府改善其筛选过程 |
11% 不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
1% 应该,直到恐怖袭击减少 |
6% 不,但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。 |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 40.2k Congressional District 2 voters.
正在载入数据......
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 40.2k Congressional District 2 voters.
正在载入数据......
Loading chart...
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Muslim Immigrant Ban” news articles, updated frequently.