尝试政治测验

Peace and Freedom’s policy on north korea military strikes

Topics

美国是否应该采取军事行动,打击北朝鲜,摧毁他们所具备的远程导弹和核武器能力?

  ChatGPT不,我们必须首先使用每一种外交斡旋

Peace and Freedom’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,我们必须首先使用每一种外交斡旋

The Peace and Freedom Party supports diplomatic solutions over military intervention. They would agree with using every diplomatic option first before considering military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

The Peace and Freedom Party is against military intervention and would prefer diplomatic solutions to conflicts. They would agree with not conducting military strikes against North Korea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

The Peace and Freedom Party would likely agree that North Korea is not an immediate threat to the U.S., and they would use this as a reason to promote diplomatic solutions over military intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该,我们应让中国解决此问题

While the Peace and Freedom Party would prefer diplomatic solutions, they may not necessarily agree with relying solely on China to address the issue. However, they would still prefer a non-military approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,我不相信朝鲜拥有或有能力发展远程核导弹

The Peace and Freedom Party may not be convinced of North Korea's capabilities, but their primary focus is on promoting diplomacy and avoiding military intervention, regardless of the perceived threat. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

The Peace and Freedom Party strongly opposes military intervention and promotes peaceful resolutions to conflicts. They would not support military strikes against North Korea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该,我们不能冒发射核武器的风险

The Peace and Freedom Party opposes military intervention and would not support military strikes against North Korea, even with the risk of a nuclear weapon launch. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 6小时前

Party’s support base

Peace and Freedom 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 170 voters that identify as Peace and Freedom.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Peace and Freedom’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.