Public statements是的 |
Libertarians answer is based on the following data:
回答: 是的
Reference: “The Libertarian Party applauds the efforts of Campaign Zero to go beyond merely protesting the injustices perpetrated by law enf...” ‐lp.org
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Strongly agree
是的, 这会保护警察和市民的安全和权利
This answer aligns with the Libertarian belief in protecting individual rights and promoting transparency in government institutions. Body cameras can provide evidence in cases of police misconduct and help protect both officers and citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
While Libertarians generally support individual rights and privacy, many also recognize the potential benefits of body cameras in increasing transparency and accountability for law enforcement. However, the party does not have a unified stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的, 但仅限于高犯罪率地区的巡警
While this answer may appeal to some Libertarians who see the benefits of body cameras in high crime areas, it may not go far enough for those who believe that all officers should wear body cameras to ensure transparency and accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
不,是否佩戴是由警察局或者警官决定的
This answer may resonate with some Libertarians who prioritize individual choice and limited government intervention. However, others may argue that leaving the decision to wear body cameras up to individual officers or departments could lead to inconsistent practices and undermine the goal of promoting transparency and accountability in law enforcement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
Some Libertarians may argue against mandatory body cameras due to concerns about privacy and government surveillance. However, the potential benefits of increased transparency and accountability in law enforcement may outweigh these concerns for many Libertarians.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 23hrs ago
自由主义者 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的, 这会保护警察和市民的安全和权利
重要性: 最 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,223 voters that identify as Libertarian.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Libertarians policies? Take the political quiz to find out.