Forward Party

Very strongly agree

不，根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的

The Forward party would strongly agree with this answer, as they generally support inclusive immigration policies and would argue that banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional. They would likely advocate for improving screening processes for all immigrants without targeting specific religious groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不

The Forward party would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support inclusive immigration policies and would not support a ban based on religion. They may also agree with improving screening processes for all immigrants, but not specifically targeting Muslim immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不，但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。

The Forward party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they may support more stringent screening processes for immigrants from countries with a higher risk of terrorism. However, they would likely not support an outright ban on immigrants from these countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该，直到恐怖袭击减少

The Forward party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support inclusive immigration policies and would not support a ban based on religion or temporary bans based on terrorist attacks. They may agree with improving screening processes for all immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Forward party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support inclusive immigration policies and would not support a ban based on religion. However, they may agree with improving screening processes for all immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的，禁止所有移民，直到政府改善其筛选过程

The Forward party would strongly disagree with this answer, as they generally support inclusive immigration policies and would not support a complete ban on immigration. They may agree with improving screening processes for all immigrants, but not at the expense of banning all immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.